Blog


Contributor Guidelines

Submitting guest blogs is open to Global Washington’s members of the Atlas level and above. We value a diversity of opinions on a broad range of subjects of interest to the global health and development community.

Blog article submissions should be 500-1500 words. Photos, graphs, videos, and other art that supports the main themes are strongly encouraged.

You may not be the best writer, and that’s okay. We can help you shape and edit your contribution. The most important thing is that it furthers an important conversation in your field, and that it is relatively jargon-free. Anyone without a background in global development should still be able to engage with your ideas.

If you include statistics or reference current research, please hyperlink your sources in the text, wherever possible.

Have an idea of what you’d like to write about? Let’s continue the conversation! Email comms@globalWA.org and put “Blog Idea” in the subject line.


Refocusing Global Health Sector Aid…But to Where?

by guest blogger Patricia Orozco

global-health1Secretary Clinton’s speech earlier this month about the future of development policy suggested some interesting changes in US efforts to advance the global health sector —

 “Through our new Global Health Initiative, we will build on our success with PEPFAR and other infectious diseases, and we will focus more attention on maternal, newborn, and child health, where there is still a long way to go. We will invest $63 billion over the next six years to help our partners improve their own health systems and provide the care that their own people need…”

The CGD blogs that Secretary Clinton is right in pointing out the need to invest in the health systems of recipient countries—a move that steers health sector assistance away from its “too narrow a focus” of simply increasing the number of antiretroviral treatment beneficiaries.

What’s appealing about this potential “re-balancing act” is its sustainable, localized perspective. By helping to strengthen systems, recipient countries can take ownership of caring for their populations. I like how specific Secretary Clinton is in describing the future direction of the US’s work in this sector. Yet this move towards supporting health care systems and focusing efforts on improving maternal and child health in the developing world also raises a critical question: Has the US considered all potential options for refocusing efforts to advance global health?  Where else can global health sector assistance go?

The US has concentrated a huge amount of global health efforts, financially and otherwise, on HIV/AIDS. But is there too much emphasis on battling this disease? What about targeting other diseases that also have huge burdens on the populations and yet are easier to treat? A recent NYT article stated “Diarrhea kills 1.5 million young children a year in developing countries — more than AIDS, malaria, and measles combined — but only 4 in 10 of those who need the oral rehydration solution that can prevent death for pennies get it.” Pneumonia is another leading killer of children and can also be treated inexpensively, as opposed to AIDS which requires lifelong medication. So while PEPFAR has successfully provided antiretroviral treatment to the neediest populations and no one can deny the impact it’s made and I’m not advocating for PEPFAR to wean off from supporting these programs, I just wonder how some of these resources can be redirected to also address these other critical diseases.

I also have to question how PEPFAR has supported partner health systems and whether the US is really equipped to expand these efforts. In many ways, PEPFAR’s approach to global health aid is directly aligned with GW’s Four Principles of Aid Effectiveness. PEPFAR’s “partnership frameworks” are framed around supporting transparency, accountability and local ownership; it provides publicly available documents delineating funding allocations; targets partner countries who have the highest HIV/AIDS adult prevalence rates; etc.  But in what ways can PEPFAR improve how it helps partners? Global Health Council’s President/CEO Dr. Jeffery L. Sturchio argues for the strict inclusion of family planning and gender considerations in guiding PEPFAR managers in the field. He thinks this approach, integrating reproductive health services and HIV/AIDS, will help remove crucial barriers preventing more infections.

Focus on Global Education: Global Washington Members

globeHey Global Washington Fans! 
 

Last week, we introduced our new global education blog. Soon, you will hear about how the earthquake in Haiti is affecting schools, education and youth in the region. Our thoughts and support are with the victims of the quake, as well as the many dedicated aid workers who are on the ground in Haiti.

 
Today, our GLOBAL ED BLOG is highlighting some of the great global education work done by Global Washington members. Below are just a few of the Washington State International Education All-Stars!
 
One World Now! – A highly innovative program which provides language, leadership and study abroad opportunities to underserved high school students.
Global Visionaries empowers youth from diverse socio-economic, ethnic, racial, and geographic backgrounds to become active leaders and global citizens who promote justice.
University of Washington Office of Global Affairs – skillfully navigates the strategic coordination of the UW’s expansive efforts to globalize research, education, and engagement.

Foundation for International Understanding Through Students (FIUTS) – FIUTS is a center for all things international, working to foster international understanding and cultural exchange, and providing an environment where ideas, issues, and the spirit of internationalism could be fostered.

World Affairs Council – the leading foreign affairs forum in the Pacific Northwest.

These are just a few of the great organizations in Washington State. Please stay tuned for more highlights and updates. Email me with any international ed stories you’d like featured in the global ed blog.

 

 

 

 

 

Policy News Roundup – Clinton vs Congress, Spinning the Haiti Crisis, and more

FOREIGN AID REFORM

Clinton combats Congress on foreign aid reform

Brookings blog gives Obama a B- for his work on global development in 2009, and wonders if Shah will preside over an “agency without agency” in 2010.

Rajiv Shah was sworn in as USAID administrator on January 12th

Steve Radelet of the Center for Global Development and “father of the Millennium Challenge Corporation” is under consideration for top development advisor position at the State Department.

Renowned International Economist Jagdish Bhagwati reviews Dambiso Moyo’s controversial book, Dead Aid

William Easterly has edited a new book, along with Jessica Cohen, What Works in Development, published by Brookings.

 

POLICY SPINS ON THE HAITI CRISIS

Is the recent US government assistance to Haiti more military intervention than humanitarian response?

On the bright side, Haiti could transform itself after quake

Want to help Haiti?  Let the Haitians stay here longer

To Help Haiti, End Foreign Aid

According to the Austrian school economists, a market-based recovery is the only way Haiti will transform itself

 

CLIMATE

CGD Paper finds that educating girls has a positive impact on a country’s ability to adapt to extreme weather.

Post-Copenhagen perspectives from developing country participants

Water wars may be imminent for India and Pakistan