Washington organizations responding to the Haiti disaster

Many of our members, as well as countless other groups, are providing crucial aid to survivors of the magnitude 7.0 earthquake that devasted Haiti this week. We’ve compiled a great list of relief efforts and resources and hope you will find it helpful as you seek out effective and meaningful ways to contribute. Be sure to check back often as we are continually updating, and email any additions and suggestions to us at admin@globalwa.org

Welcome to the NEW Weekly Installment of the GW International Education Blog!

by Global Washington Education Coordinator Mariah Ortiz and GW intern, Pat Orozco

Recently, a team of global education volunteers has been convened to support the international education work of Global Washington members.  Washington State has a dynamic global education community!  Many organizations work together to shape culturally competent citizens, who will take full advantage of our interconnected world and form a strong foundation for the state’s dynamic global development field. Global education is the tide that lifts the international development industry’s many boats.

This is the first of many upcoming blogs, which will highlight global education organizations, schools, business, nonprofits and other public agencies throughout the state.  You will be hearing from many of our wonderful global ed volunteers:  Michelle, Kelly C., Kelly T., Lindsay, Luke, Pat and Sheel.  We also welcome any story ideas or news submissions for inclusion in the blog!  Email Mariah Ortiz with your ideas!

What kind of international education project has Global Washington been working on?

·    Global Learning Goals

The Washington State Global Learning Goals are the result of collaboration between Global Washington and faculty from seven Washington State institutions of higher education. The goals express Washington State’s support for global education.  They serve three major objectives: (1) bring statewide attention to the importance of producing globally-competent graduates; (2) provide a platform of common goals for Washington colleges and universities that can be adapted to fit individual institutional missions; and (3) position Washington State as a leader in global learning.

28 colleges and universities in the state have endorsed the Global Learning Goals so far. The goal is for all Washington State college and university presidents to endorse the Global Learning Goals. We are reaching out to institutions, advocating for their endorsement of the goals, and inclusion in school policies and curriculum.

·    Metrics for Assessing Global Learning Goals Implementation
In collaboration with the Global Washington Educational Advisory Committee, the Global Ed team is researching ways to assess the impact of programs that support the Global Learning Goals.  We are researching best practices for measuring global learning programs. Our aim is to identify a clear, easily adoptable and uniform set of metrics and tools that higher education institutions can use to assess the progress of their global efforts.

·    Updating the International and Global Learning Inventory

Global Washington published a report in 2007 that provides detailed information about the international global learning opportunities available to students at Washington’s four-year degree granting colleges and universities. The Inventory shows the depth, breadth and innovation of the state’s formal and informal global education programs.  We are updating the report to make the content easily and publicly accessible and more comprehensive by including more higher learning institutions.

Seattle-Area Groups Working In Haiti

“The question has already been posed to me several times: Who in the Seattle area is doing work in Haiti?…For a good idea of which Washington companies and nonprofits are working in Haiti, take a look at the list provided by Global Washington.”

Seattle-Area Groups Working In Haiti
Puget Sound Business Journal |  Clay Holtzman | Jan 13, 2010

What’s New and Exciting? Policy News Roundup

Here’s a roundup of interesting development policy-related news from the last couple of weeks.  Did we miss anything?  Let us know in the comments.

Secretary of State Clinton made a speech about the future of development policy last Wednesday, and there is no shortage of commentary-  from William Easterly, Nicholas Kristof, Paul O’Brien of Oxfam, Chris Blattman, Devex, and others (Women are the Solution and Men May be the Problem in Developing Countries, IPS news).  Click here to see CGD’s compilation of major media coverage of this speech.  Global Washington covered this speech as well– I was curious about how much of Clinton’s speech addressed GW’s four principles of aid effectiveness– not very much.  Stay tuned for more analysis of this speech, with a particular look at global health.

World Vision speaks out against the proposed Anti-Homosexuality Bill of 2009 in Uganda, which threatens to imugandapose the death penalty on homosexuals. This bill could undermine World Vision’s work in Uganda by stigmatizing people in the communities it targets, according to the World Vision Uganda national director.

You’ll probably agree that reducing spending on foreign aid to ease the federal fiscal crunch is an idea from the “Hall of Lame.”

Cash on Delivery Aid makes some international development professionals anxious, and Nancy Birdsall responds in the Center for Global Development blog

Economists warn that Vietnam may get stuck in a middle-income trap, though many Vietnamese people worry about being stuck in a no-income trap.

Pakistani government and NGO’s vying for a piece of the $7.5 billion foreign aid package– education is a key component, but who will control this money is in question.  The problems are so large that there still won’t be enough to go around, according to experts.

Traditional knowledge complements modern science: indigenous rainmakers in Kenya work with meteorologists on climate change research.

Senator Cantwell introduced a climate bill that would “cap and dividend” as an alternative to “cap and trade.” Read article here and see Cantwell’s page of links on Carbon Limits and Energy for America’s Renewal (CLEAR) Act here.

The Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network, MFAN, recaps progress on foreign aid reform in 2009 and looks ahead to 2010.

Secretary Clinton’s Future of Development and Global Washington’s Principles of Aid Effectiveness

source: Foreign Policy magazine

source: Foreign Policy magazine

Hillary Clinton made a speech on development reform yesterday that is well-covered in the media.  You can read commentaries on the speech by Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times, William Easterly in Foreign Policy Magazine, blogger Chris Blattman, Devex (for the development worker perspective) and others, like this article on how not only are women the solution but men may be the problem in developing countries.

I agree with the eternal development policy critic Bill Easterly in that by covering so much ground and not focusing on what she sees as the most important reforms, Clinton has not really given us much information on what she plans to do with USAID and development in the next year.  Her discussions of the importance of development to international security and the need to focus on women and girls stand out to me.   She also said a lot about coordination, but I don’t really see any new ideas or commitments to actually coordinate anything.

Rather than give you a summary or a more studied critique of Clinton’s speech, I’d like to look at it from the perspective of Global Washington’s four principles of aid effectiveness.  This may be the first you are hearing about our principles.  Last year, Global Washington conducted a survey of our mailing list to see what they thought were the important issues in foreign aid reform.  We also convened a working group of experts from diverse organizations to come up with principles for aid effectiveness that could be used to guide foreign aid reform.  Our principles for aid effectiveness are: (1) Transparency and Accountability; (2) Consolidation and Coordination; (3) Local Ownership; and (4) Targeting.  We have also written a White Paper explaining these principles and using them to assess and make recommendations to improve U.S. foreign aid.  You can access that White Paper here and more information about this project here.

First, Transparency and Accountability.  Clinton talked about the need to share proof of progress in development with the public.  She also talked about monitoring and evaluation.  She made the point that is often made that the public believes much more taxpayer money is spent on development than is actually the case- in countless surveys, people have said they think that 10 to 20 percent of the U.S. budget goes to foreign aid, when that figure is really below 1%.  If we were more transparent, we could disavow people of this notion, and there would be more support for U.S.-supported foreign aid.  Also developing country nationals often tell Clinton that they were not aware of what the U.S. government spends money on in their countries, while they can list specific buildings and roads built by the Chinese or other donors.  Clinton could have been more specific about initiatives to be more transparent and accountable to both the public and the people in developing countries.

Second, Consolidation and Coordination.  Clinton had a lot to say about coordinating development across sectors, such as health and trade, and with defense operations.  She talked about the need for USAID and State to have the staff to design, implement, and evaluate its programs, which would help with coordination.  She also thinks coordination should be done on the country level- often the ambassador in a country does not know all the USG development folks there.  She did not mention people outside the government, but I think that would be the next step, to at least know who is doing what both within and outside the government.  Global Washington considers policy coherence to be an important part of consolidation and coordination- development must be a consideration in policy areas where development experts do not traditionally have a voice, such as trade and energy policy.  Clinton’s discussion of bringing development experts together with the military leaders in Afghanistan and Iraq is germane to this issue, but she didn’t go further to policy coherence in areas outside defense.  During the Q&A she was asked a pointed question about trade and she hinted at the importance of trade policies for development, “in some of the sort of free trade agreements that we’ve entered into in the last several years, the benefits have not really been broadly distributed… So I think we need to enter into a new trade agenda with as many lessons learned as possible.”  But we would like to see more about policy coherence.

Third, Local Ownership.  Clinton quoted President Obama, “we are adopting a model of development based on partnership, not patronage.”    She talked about working case-by-case, country-by-country.  But as William Easterly pointed out in the Foreign Affairs opinion piece, she did not mention the inherent conflict between local ownership and evidence-based development programs.  Even when she was asked about this conflict during the Q&A, she kind of skirted the question by saying that we needed both.  This is a difficult question, and I don’t have the answer, but I think that you need to at least admit there is a conflict in order to have a vision that you can honestly follow.

Lastly, Targeting.  Global Washington members want foreign aid targeted at the most poor.  Clinton made no mention of this in her speech, though she did discuss targeting women and children at length.  She also said that we “have to be selective and strategic about where and how to get involved,” whether it’s to improve long-term security in places torn by conflict, or to further progress in countries that have become regional anchors of stability.

Rajiv Shah Confirmed and Other News

shah-480x348Rajiv Shah was confirmed as the Administrator for USAID on December 24th by unanimous consent in the Senate.  Here are some related articles:

Smarter foreign aid: How to fix USAID, by David Beckmann of Bread for the World and MFAN.

Raj Shah and America’s Development Future by Bill Frist

 

 

Other development policy-related news

 
LOCAL NEWS

 Seattle-based company WorldLink Education strands students in China.

Food coop PCC (also based in Seattle) criticizes Gates Foundation’s approach to agriculture.

 
COPENHAGEN

Climate talks: Clinton promises aid to poor nations – but China may resist

Adapting to less money and more migrants.  The developed countries have less money to help poor countries, and there are going to be a lot more climate change refugees.

 
FOREIGN AID

Book Review: Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There Is A Better Way for Africa by Dambisa Moyo; and Enough: Why the World’s Poorest Starve in an Age of Plenty by Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman.  Both books discuss the problems with foreign aid and have different controversial solutions.  Dambisa Moyo suggests that Africa would be better without foreign aid, and Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman have ideas to reform aid.

CGD and Foreign Policy magazine award annual Commitment to Development award to Diego Hidalgo Schnur, a Spanish philanthropist, academic and businessman.

New details on Obama’s aid package for Pakistan.

 

JUST KIDDING

William Easterly pokes fun with How to Write about Poor People.pooristan

Copenhagen Outcome: Disappointing, but not Devastating?

By now you have heard the news: an agreement of sorts was reached in Copenhagen, and no one is impressed.  The deal falls far short of even modest expectations, and has no teeth.  The silver lining is that it is possibly a first step on the way to more controls on carbon emissions.  We will have to keep pushing our leaders if we want more.  It will be too easy to forget about global climate change and move on to the next topic du jour, if we don’t stay vigilant.  Until the one day when it is too late.

Here is a summary of the Copenhagen Agreement, from the New York Times:

New York Times

from the New York Times

December 2009 Newsletter

Welcome to the December 2009 issue of the Global Washington newsletter. If you would like to contact us directly, please email us.

 

IN THIS ISSUE

Note from our Executive Director

Bookda1Greetings-

I want to thank all of you who attended our conference for being there and for making this first annual conference such an incredible success.   We are delighted with the positive feedback, the number of people who came and were part of the event (over 300), and with the number of people who helped plan the conference.  Thank you for all of your work. Our staff and steering committee will now take the next 6 weeks to review the notes from the breakout sessions and begin the process of planning for 2010.   Thanks for all the input.  We will be in touch to follow up on the next steps.

Another exciting project that we have been able to finalize this year is a white paper which was done with the help of the Jackson School at the University of Washington.   This paper highlights how United States foreign assistance could be more effective at delivering aid to address global development challenges.  This report identifies principles of aid effectiveness and uses them to diagnose the major problems facing U.S. foreign assistance.  It also proposes recommendations for meeting 21st century global development challenges.  Please click here to read the full report.

I wanted to bring to your attention a new petition that the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) is circulating for a global development strategy to give development a strong voice in foreign policy decisions.  They already have collected over 30,000 signatures- let’s increase these signatures and help them reach their goal of 150,000.  They are collecting signatures until December 22nd.    You can simply click here to sign the petition. Congress has just passed the FY2010 Global Aid and Operations Budget that contains funding for the State Department and other foreign operations, which you can read about here.

Thank you all so much for all of your support in 2009.  We look forward to your active participation in 2010 in shaping our work and strategy. And no matter how you celebrate this season and the coming of a new year, may your days be filled with happiness and love.

In unity,
Bookda Gheisar, Executive Director

top

Spotlight: First Annual Global Washington Conference a Great Success!

KristofWe at Global Washington are thrilled with the success of our first annual conference on Monday, December 7th!

Over 300 people participated in the day’s events, engaging in lively discussions and sharing strategic approaches for strengthening cross-sector collaboration among Washington State’s dynamic global development community. We learned a great deal from our esteemed keynote speakers and panels of experts, taking away lessons that will help to make future development efforts more effective. Chief among these lessons is the understanding that public-private partnerships, local ownership, and the empowerment of women should play a key role in future development strategy.

Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times opened the conference by stressing the importance of focusing development efforts on the empowerment of women and education. Often, women-centered solutions to problems suffered in the developing world are much more cost-effective. For example, at a cost of 50 cents a year per child, deworming can significantly increase school-attendance, particularly for girls.

By focusing on education, particularly on educating women, Kristof believes a nation has an advantage over other developing countries. BangladeWillson_Bahiash provides a strong example in emphasizing education in the female population after its separation from West Pakistan in 1971. In turn, the focus on education provided the opportunity for the development of a busy garment industry and successful micro-lending institutions.

The day’s first panel focused on what strategies may be implemented to help alleviate poverty and empower women. The panel agreed that collaboration and partnership with the local communities, as well as an adaptable strategy are key to the success of development projects.

Rick Beckett, President of Global Partnerships stressed the strategy of inclusion in microfinance, which has helped Global Partnerships to achieve a 98% loan repayment rate. Renee Giovarelli of the Rural Development Institute understands the need to lisPanel 1ten to the local community, a principle that has guided RDI in providing land rights as a transformative investment in the community. Margaret Willson of the Bahia Street School in Brazil strongly believes in cooperation and local ownership of aid projects, stating the importance of ceding power to the local community.

In the second keynote address, Ambassador Elizabeth Bagley, discussed the importance of developing partnerships between the public and private sectors in an effort to better combat the world’s challenges. With 80% of all aid money from the U.S. coming from private sources such as businesses, philanthropists, and non-profits, it is pivotal that the government works alongside the private sector. With such partnerships, Ambassador Bagley Amb Bagleybelieves the world can work together towards the empowerment of women, an end to human trafficking, and more sustainable energy practices.

The second panel also focused on the need of partnerships between the public and private sectors as a way to more effectively implement development strategies. Gary Kotzen of Costco emphasized the need of businesses to partner with and develop local farmers and producers as a way to facilitate growth at both the local level and the business level.IMG_1097

Given the state of the current global financial system, funding for non-profit development projects may be more difficult to acquire. As a solution to this problem, John Beale of VillageReach sees partnerships between businesses and non-profits as a way to continue to maintain development projects even when most of the funding dries up.

After the opportunity to engage and learn from our speakers and panelists, we gave attendees the chance to engage each other in dialogue focused on what can be done to make our global development efforts more effective. Participants were Badshahsplit into cross-sectoral groups as well as specific issue areas to discuss the challenges in today’s global development sector and identify solutions to create a more effective strategy to alleviate poverty and suffering worldwide.

Thank you to everyone who attended the conference and to those who support it through sponsorships, planning and staffing. Most of all, thank you for your insights and contributions to our Blueprint for Action. We are in the midst of compiling your suggestions for how Global WA can better serve Washington State’s global development sector, and we will share a finalized Blueprint for Action in early 2010.breakout

To see photos and video of conference highlights, click here.

Click on these links to read media coverage of the Global Washington conference by:

The Huffington Post, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, The Redmond Reporter and Puget Sound Business Journal

Photos by Nancy Levine

top

Featured Organization: Grameen Foundation

You are a farmer in a small Ugandan village.  Your sole source of income is the bananas you grow and sell to people in the village.  A new mold appears on the bananas that you’ve never seen before.  What do you do?  You ask your neighbors, but no one can identify it.  Thanks to the Grameen Foundation, information is now available.  You go to the local Village Phone Operator and ask him or her to send a text message describing the problem to Farmer’s Friend.  For a small charge you’ll get an answer back almost instantly.

GF Final LogoGrameen Foundation is a global organization focused on poverty alleviation through access to microfinance and technology.  Founded in 1996 by Alex Counts after years of mentoring under Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and Grameen Bank founder Muhammad Yunus in Bangladesh, the organization directly works to alleviate poverty through its programs and collaboration with local organizations around the world.  Grameen Foundation has close to 100 staff, split between Washington, DC, Seattle, and countries around the world.

Grameen Foundation’s programs focus on scalability, maximizing impact, financial sustainability and focusing on the poorest of the poor:  those living on less than $1 per day. Grameen Foundation and its local partners, including microfinance institutions (MFIs) delivering financial services to the poor, apply these principles in their own programs.  Grameen Foundation looks for barriers and hurdles preventing both MFIs and poor people from being successful in their efforts to get out of poverty.  Then, Grameen Foundation figures out how to tackle those barriers.

Access to capital markets is one of the hurdles for microfinance organizations.  Loans made across international borders are subject to fluctuations in capital market exchange rates.  These currency fluctuations mean that someone has to take exchange rate hits. In order to bypass market fluctuations, Grameen Foundation guarantees funds to the local banks in local currency for loans to MFIs.   These banks can leverage the guarantee provide by Grameen Foundation making more funds available to MFIs than the actual amount of the guarantee.   In the Philippines, the MFIs created a bond product, which the Foundation guaranteed.

Another issue that prevents MFIs from increasing the scale of their efforts is lack of professional staff development and succession planning.    Grameen Foundation provides professional staff training for MFIs, providing guidance and acts as a resource for best practices.

Grameen Foundation developed the Progress out of Poverty Index to enable MFI’s to accurately assess the scope of poverty in their region and measure the effectiveness of the assistance they provide.   The Progress out of Poverty Index utilizes a list of simple questions to determine the financial status of the poor participating in the micro-loan process.  These questions relate to family size, number of children in school, and housing rather than typical financial questions.   A value is assigned to each answer so that the MFIs can determine where a particular client appears on the poverty scale.  By averaging all such values, the MFI can determine the average poverty level of the clients they assist.  By asking the same  series of questions repeatedly over time, the MFI can track each client’s movement out of poverty.

Providing the poorest of the poor with access to micro-loans is only one aspect of the financial assistance needed to alleviate poverty. The Grameen Foundation recently received a grant from the Gates Foundation to create 1.5 million new micro-savers in three countries.

On the technology side, the Foundation helps implement the work of the Grameen Technology Center, the Seattle based program which  develops technology-based solutions for MFIs and the customers they serve. The Grameen Technology Center created Mifos, an Open Source software application that enables MFIs to collect and track information about their business and their clients.  MFIs have difficulty growing beyond several thousand clients because they have many problems related to getting timely and accurate business intelligence.  The Foundation is helping several large MFIs, such as Grameen Koota with 300,000 clients and ENDA in Tunisia to use Mifos in order to grow and serve more clients effectively.  Others are using it on their own as an Open Source product and the Foundation assists them when asked.

Through the Village Phone program, Grameen Foundation is providing access to telecommunication services for the rural poor. Access to information is a key factor in lifting people out of poverty and allowing them to build and maintain sustainable businesses.  To date, The Village Phone program has built a network of 25,000 Village Phone Operators in six countries.  Grameen Foundation is expanding the original Village Phone concept to allow the Village Phone Operators to sell airtime as well as act as a communication link for the people in their Villages.

The Grameen Foundation’s ICT Innovation program builds on the success of Village Phone by developing applications that can be accessed via mobile phone through text messaging.    The Foundation has partnered with Google and MTN, an African telecommuncations company, to support these information applications in Uganda and Ghana.  In the opening example, a farmer who discovers an unknown mold growing on his crop of bananas can send a text message to the Farmer’s Friend application and receive information on how to treat his plants to remove the mold.  Grameen develops and refines the application, Google facilitates the searches, and  MTN provides the network service to rural areas.    ICT Innovations is transforming the Village Phone Operator into a knowledge worker, the broker of information needed by the local farmer who may not be able to text himself even if he had a phone.

Lastly, the Village Energy program is working to develop safe and sustainable energy solutions for the rural poor.    The goal of Village Energy is to improve the quality of life of the poor by providing access to electricity through the use of solar energy devices and other sustainable energy solutions.

The Grameen Foundation mobilizes resources to provide financial, professional and technological support to enable the poorest of the world’s poor to break the cycle of poverty.   Its innovative strategies and products for MFIs and deployment of technological solutions for those who live on less than a dollar a day put it at the forefront of an old American entrepreneurial and philanthropic tradition–figuring out a way to make it work.

Learn more about how Grameen Foundation uses microfinance and innovative technology to fight global poverty and bring opportunities to the world’s poorest people at www.grameenfoundation.org
top

Changemaker: Chris Fontana – For want of a lesson plan, 5,000 lives have increased opportunity

The holidays were over, but no time for lesson planning left Chris Fontana facing his high school class in Chicago in 1992 with no lesson for the day.  (Chris insists, by the way, that not being prepared was quite unusual for him.)  Reaching into the teacher’s bag of tricks, he had his students discuss current events.  One student’s presentation of an article on the disappearing rain forests caught the imagination of both the class and the teacher and created a wave of enthusiasm for doing something about the problem.  The class decided to collect all the paper the school used.  The janitor agreed to store it for them.  Ten days later they piled all the paper up in the school cafeteria in front of the students, faculty and local press, illustrating from their own lives their contribution to deforestation.

FontanaThe bug stayed with both Chris and his students.  He started reading the environmental reporter for the Christian Science Monitor.  He became the faculty advisor to the environmental club.  The class organized a summit of students looking for ways to avoid environmental degradation, bringing in speakers and arranging places for attendees to stay who had far to travel. Just three years later, those students had become YES,  the organization which organized Global Youth Environmental Summit of 1995, co-sponsored by the United Nations Environmental Program, which brought together 300 high school students from 32 countries and 40 States for one week of education in environmental and peace issues, social action and leadership skills, and direct environmental service.  Chris was the organization’s mentor and sponsor.  Over the next few years, a total of six summits were put on, entirely by the students.

A chance meeting with Robert Mueller, the U.N. Under-Secretary General and co-founder of the University for Peace, on a trip to Guatemala inspired Chris to want to help youth develop information first hand about what they could do to address deforestation and problems of underdevelopment.  To that end, Chris moved to Seattle, where, from 1996 to 1998, he studied Whole Systems Design at Antioch University and started Global Visionaries.  In the beginning of the school year in 2001 he quit his job to devote full time to Global Visionaries.  Then September 11 occurred.  Maybe it wasn’t the easiest time to create an organization enabling enable young people to travel to economically challenged countries, but, as Chris recognized, it would prove a time more critical than ever to produce concerned global citizens.

Global Visionaries is an after school youth leadership program run by students from more than 12 Seattle high schools. By design, 50% of the participants are from economically challenged families and 50% are from upper or middle class families.  It teaches the skills of leadership, educates and trains students in cross-cultural understanding, fundraising, social action and empowers students to take the crucial steps to eliminate racism and social inequalities both at home and abroad. GV participants learn how to become leaders in their local and the global community. Through socially conscious and environmentally focused education and community service in Seattle and abroad, and recognizing that youth need to work together to be the change for the future, GV encourages youth to seek alternative and innovative approaches to the problems facing their generation.

global visionaries logoThe trip to Guatemala at the end of the first year provides two weeks of immersion in Mayan Culture and Spanish language.  The trip allows students to learn not only about the benefits and shortcomings of America’s role in Guatemalan history but also how Mayan culture affects the opportunities of Guatemalans today. The students live in the homes of Guatemalans and work on one of four projects: reforestation, coffee production, clinics or school construction.  The project work is based on partnerships Global Visionaries has created with such Seattle groups as Earth Corps or Architects Without Borders, Seattle Chapter or Guatemalan groups such as San Miguel-based NGO, As Green As It Gets.  The second year ends with a retreat which emphasizes how students can integrate what they learned over the previous two years into their lives here.

Global Visionaries has just completed its first five year planning thanks to a grant from the Seattle International Fund.  Its future will emphasize four items.  1.  Become a truly international organization with the Guatemalan leadership programming for Guatemalan youth on par with programming for U.S. students. 2. Create solid organizational infrastructure and strong staff professional development training.  3.  Integrate and expand the after school and in-school leadership programs to reach 20% of Seattle youth by 2020.  4.  Expand opportunities for students to stay involved as alumni.

Chris was Antioch Alumni of the Year in 2007 and won the Thomas C. Wales Passionate Citizen Award in 2008.   Chris’ approach remains guided by human rights lawyer’s Jason Foster’s insight that young people have the vision, skill and time to do anything, they just need the opportunity.  Chris is in the opportunity business.

Global Visionaries is the third of organizations recently featured by Global Washington that focus on youth leadership training.  One World Now and Global Citizens Corps, come at the issue from opposite sides.  One World Now features training economically disadvantaged American youth in global economics and politics and emphasizes Chinese and Arabic language training.  Global Citizen Corps harnesses technology to train young people living in conflict areas to improve their own lives and the political processes in their countries.  Global Visionaries, brings American young people from economically disadvantaged families together with American young people from economically comfortable ones, helping them learn to work together in the context of global politics and economics.  These organizations are laboratories for what works.
top

Global Entertainment: Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics

activistsActivists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (1998) by Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink

As a hat-tip to Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl Wudunn for their call to action to end the oppression of women around the world in Half The Sky (Kristof recently provided the key note address at Global Washington’s December conference), this month’s review focuses on Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink’s book Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Written back in 1998, this book is a now classic study of how transnational advocacy networks (TANs) effect change around the world. Kristof and Wudunn seem to be calling for the creation of such an advocacy movement—and Activists Beyond Borders provides additional insight into how this might work.

The book sets out to answer the following questions: 1) how can we define a transnational advocacy network (and who comprises one); 2) why and how these networks have emerged; 3) how TANs work; and 4) under what conditions they have influence. Keck and Sikkink do a fantastic job of interweaving theory and empirical case studies to arrive at answers to these questions. They analyze a wide variety of both successful and unsuccessful campaigns that these transnational networks have waged over the years: the 19th century Anglo-American campaign to end slavery in the United States; the international suffrage movement to secure women’s voting rights between 1888 and 1928; the campaign by Western missionaries to eradicate foot binding in China; an early attempt to stop female circumcision in Africa; human rights campaigns in Argentina and Mexico in the 1970’s and 80s; and campaigns by international environmental networks to stop tropical deforestation and to stop environmental degradation via economic development.

The book does not offer a blueprint for a successful transnational social movement, but it does illuminate several factors that have enabled or undermined success in previous campaigns. Keck and Sikkink identify a number of key techniques that advocacy networks use, including the use of information, symbolic acts, leverage politics, and accountability:  “Networks stress gathering and reporting reliable information, but also dramatize facts by using testimonies of specific individuals to evoke commitment and broader understanding. Activists use important symbolic events and conferences to publicize issues and build networks. In addition to trying to persuade through information and symbolic politics, networks also try to pressure targets to change policies by making an implied or explicit threat of sanctions or leverage if the gap between norms and practices remains too large. Material leverage comes from linking the issue of concern to money, trade, or prestige, as more powerful institutions or governments are pushed to apply pressure. Moral leverage pushes actors to change their practices by holding their behavior up to international scrutiny, or by holding governments or institutions accountable to previous commitments and principles they have endorsed.”

On the other hand, the use of such tactics is no guarantee that a campaign will succeed. National and international political, cultural, and ideological contexts can aid or thwart advocacy efforts. Securing the buy-in of influential local actors and NGOs also plays an important role—as do a host of other factors. For instance, comparing the campaign against foot binding in China (success) to the early campaign against female circumcision in Kenya (failed), Keck and Sikkink write: “In Kenya, a group of missionaries with tepid support from colonial authorities confronted a politically weak but ideologically strong opposition in the KCA.  In China, a well-organized set of antifootbinding societies faced strongly entrenched cultural beliefs, but no effectively organized political opposition.  When the societies gained the support of the both the Imperial Court and the nationalist reformer politicians, the eventual success of their campaign was insured.”

Perhaps the most valuable insight in Activists Beyond Borders is the important role that issues framing and resonance plays in transnational advocacy campaigns. Advocacy networks must be able to “mobilize information strategically to help create new issues and categories and to persuade, pressure, and gain leverage over much more powerful organizations and governments.”  Activists in networks “try not only to influence policy outcomes, but to transform the terms and nature of the debate.” In addition: “New ideas are more likely to be influential if they fit well with existing ideas and ideologies in a particular historical setting.”  Thus, the antifootbinding campaign in China was a success in big part because the issue framing carried out by missionaries and local actors resonated strongly with the revolutionary iconoclasm of the times (foot binding was reframed as a backward, traditional, and elitist practice that did not fit with China’s effort to modernize); while the campaign to end female circumcision in Kenya was easy delegitimized by local nationalist groups as yet another form of colonial domination.

One criticism of Activists Beyond Borders is that it looks at social movements from a primarily international perspective, and thus does not pay much attention to the valuable role of embedded, locally-grown nongovernmental organizations. But here is where we pick up Kristof and Wudunn’s book, which details many such local organizations and explains how international networks can cooperate to achieve shared goals.

Ketty Loeb, Founder
Wokai Seattle

top

Announcements

  • Join Now! Global Washington Welcoming New Members for 2010 : With the great momentum we’ve created in 2009, the benefits of joining Global Washington are greater than ever. Our relationships have flourished and our network has grown, as evidenced by the recent media attention from The Huffington Post, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, The Redmond Reporter and Puget Sound Business Journal. Let us help you gain visibility for your work, help you gain access to policy makers and funders, and build your capacity to do good in the world in 2010. Click here to read more about the benefits of joining Global Washington.
  • RDI Publishes New Book on Global Land Rights: Global Washington member organization Rural Development Institute has just published One Billion Rising:  Law, Land and the Alleviation of Global Poverty. In this timely and important volume, lawyers from the Rural Development Institute and the University of Washington’s School of Law in Seattle use four decades worth of research on the results of land tenure reform efforts around the world in order to address how we might better meet the struggles to understand and change the plight of the rural poor. Learn more at http://www.rdiland.org/book/
  • InterConnection Partners with Bancoestado to Offer Microloans for Computers in Chile: Another great member organization, InterConnection, is using micro credit to provide computers to low income in Chile.  In March 2009, InterConnection opened a distribution center in Santiago.  The computers provided by InterConnection.org are refurbished in Seattle and shipped to Chile, where they are partnering with Chile’s national bank, Bancoestado, on a microlending program to get the computers into the hands of small business owners. Click here to learn more about the program.
  • Julia Bolz Speaks About Building Schools in Afghanistan on KUOW: This week, Global WA member Julia Bolz was a guest speaker on the KUOW show Weekday, along with Greg Mortenson, author of Three Cups of Tea. Julia is the president of Ayni Education International and the founder of a grassroots project called, “Journey with an Afghan School.”  She left her law firm in 1998 to serve as a human rights lawyer and social justice activist in the developing world.  Since 2002, she has focused on educating girls in Afghanistan, where her team has built and supplied 30 schools, serving some 25,000 children. To learn more about Julia’s work, go to aynieducation.org. Listen to the show on-demand here.

top

Upcoming Events

Click here to see a full list of international development events on the Global Washington’s calendar. Upcoming events include:

Please submit your events to our calendar!

top

contacted 763
businesses, academic centers, nonprofits
and foundations in March and April 2009,
inviting them to complete a survey of their
global development activities.
Of an estimated 763 organizations, a
sampling of 122 met our definition of
global development work based on their
survey responses, including their reported
activities in the developing world and the
kind of issues they reported addressing.

Coping with Climate Change in Copenhagen

HopenhagenThe Climate Summit in Copenhagen is on our minds this week.  The big question: by how much will we agree to reduce emissions?  And how much funding will we commit to give to developing countries to help them adjust to climate change and avoid climate-busting energy use as their economies grow?  So far, the United States has proposed cutting emissions by 3 to 4 percent of 1990 levels by 2020, whereas the European Union has agreed to a 20 percent cut.  Neither is considered sufficient, but at the rate the negotiations have been going, we might be lucky to have any deal at all.  The COP15 has been full of the usual ups and downs of any multilateral negotiating process- complete with walkouts, accusations, and really boring speeches that say nothing new (see Washington Post article).   Officials hope to have a deal by this Friday, but many observers fear that failure is looming. 

Some environmental organizations are concerned that the big polluters of the world are not going to agree to reduce emissions by enough, and that the summit will not achieve anything big enough to have a significant impact on climate change.    There is also concern about a great “greenwash” – where no matter how lackluster the outcome of the summit, all the publicity will gush about whatever small thing was accomplished no matter how insignificant. 

The EU has offered $3 billion per year over 3 years to help developing countries cope with climate change.  Experts disagree about whether this amount will have any impact, and what a sufficient amount would be. 

Global Washington member Mercy Corps is one of the many NGOs represented in Copenhagen.  From the perspective of Jim Jarvie on the Mercy Corps blog,  it sounds like the ultimate climate change conference is taking place on the sidelines of the negotiations, with presentations and discussions led by NGOs and government agencies from around the world.  Dory McIntosh writes about the peaks and troughs of the conference, especially the dismal predictions laid out by Al Gore and scientists about the effects of global climate change:  “Not only are the Greenland ice cap and Western Antarctica melting far faster than was previously thought, but the Himalayan glaciers are melting at a rate that is placing the lives of more than a billion people in jeopardy. Sea level rises of around one meter are predicted by the end of the century, which would displace an estimated 100 million people from their homes and livelihoods.”

Eco-Encore is a Seattle organization throwing its support behind the goals of the summit.  It has organized a media recycling drive to benefit 15 northwest environmental organizations, in conjunction with COP15.

Need more background?  The Seattle Times has a good quickie background piece on the talks.

thanks to Darren Nowels for help with research on this post

Thinking local is key to world aid, concludes Seattle Post-Intelligencer blogger

by Global Washington intern, Pat Orozco

Writer Joel Connelly’s biggest takeaway from Global Washington’s first annual conference: “Helpers often need to take a back seat to those they are helping.”  He cites several speakers and panelists from over 300 conference attendees, leaders in the global development field, who underscore that “local buy-in” is crucial for successful development, particularly efforts to combat poverty by empowering women and girls.

Connelly highlights panelist Margaret Willson of Bahia Street, a successful school for girls in impoverished Brazil, who makes clear that the organization’s record—12 alumna placed in Brazilian colleges and not a single unexpected pregnancy among its girls—is credited completely to the local African Brazilian women who run it. “It’s following their road map, not ours.”

Also “underscoring the Monday conference was a reality of local life: Seattle is an international city, and Washington is a state that looks outward.” Connelly points out that by thinking and acting locally and globally, the state is widely recognized for its contributions to the global development field.  He quotes Mark Emmert, president of the University of Washington, who said students today dream about having “impact on a global scale” in a way that Baby Boomers “used to think about on a national scale.”

For the full blog post, check it out here.