Global Partnerships Closes $20 Million Fund Aimed At “Microfinance Plus”

Global Partnerships Closes $20 Million Fund Aimed At “Microfinance Plus”

Social Investment Fund 2010 will provide capital to 20 MFIs across Latin America

Seattle, Wash., – Global Partnerships (GP), a 16-year-old nonprofit that supports microfinance and other sustainable solutions to poverty, announced today that it closed its fourth social investment fund at $20 million. Over the next five years, Social Investment Fund 2010 (SIF 2010) will provide much-needed loan capital to up to 20 select microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Latin America.

“By investing in MFIs that are having exceptional impact, this fund will help hundreds of thousands of people living in poverty earn a brighter future for their families,” said Rick Beckett, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Partnerships. “The fact that we raised $20 million in a challenging economic climate is a testament to the strength of our model.”

Like GP’s three previous funds, SIF 2010 is a five-year debt fund that will provide affordable loans to a select portfolio of MFIs that are financially sustainable and that reinvest profits in programs that benefit people living in poverty. With this fund, GP has sharpened its social criteria even further, prioritizing MFIs that reach people most in need of credit, such as the rural poor, and that provide innovative “microfinance-plus” programs, including preventive health services, business education, and assistance related to rural economic development.

Forty-one investors have contributed to SIF 2010, including the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and Overseas Private Investment Corp (OPIC), which both invested in two previous GP funds. Other investors include Linked Foundation and Perls Foundation; Seattle University; faith-based institutions including the Mercy Partnership Fund; and 23 accredited individual investors. The law firm Strasburger & Price provided pro bono assistance to establish the Fund.

Investors cite a range of reasons for their interest in the fund, including the combination of well-managed risk and moderate returns, the excellence of GP’s fund management and the fund’s focus on social impact.

Elizabeth Littlefield, President and CEO of OPIC, which invested $6.9 million in SIF 2010, said, “OPIC’s longstanding collaboration with Global Partnerships has yielded impressive and sustainable results for MFIs by providing vital capital to the small business owners and farmers who serve as the engine of economic activity in emerging markets.”

Elizabeth Boggs Davidsen, principal investment officer of IDB’s Opportunities for the Majority Initiative, which invested $5 million in SIF 2010, said: “We’ve been very impressed with Global Partnerships’ approach to social investment. By working with microfinance institutions to offer additional services, they are helping to bring microfinance to the next level.”

Seattle University has invested in SIF 2010 and GP’s 2006 fund because of the alignment with the University’s mis sion and GP’s rigorous due-diligence processes. “It’s a win-win. We’re doing the right thing, seeing a social return, and still getting a financial return on our invest ment,” said Ron Smith, Seattle University’s Vice President for Finance and Business Affairs. “The more you learn about GP the more impressed you are.”

GP will begin disbursing loans to new MFI partners in October of 2010. MFIs to receive initial loans include Pro Mujer in Mexico, which serves women borrowers with an integrated package of microcredit and health services and education; Fondesurco, an MFI in southern Peru that provides loans and technical assistance tailored to their agricultural clients; FRAC, a World Vision affiliate that works in some of the poorest areas of Mexico; and Comixmul, a savings-and-credit cooperative in Honduras that serves very poor women with financial and non-financial services, including training in specific trade skills and access to basic health services.

Out of the 48 million people in Latin America who could benefit from access to microcredit, only an estimated 15 percent, or 9 million, are being reached. Microfinance, especially when combined with other high-impact services, can improve the lives of borrowers who use the profits from their business to improve the living conditions for their entire household. GP estimates that over the five-year lifespan of SIF 2010, it should fund more than 200,000 microloans.

About Global Partnerships: Global Partnerships (GP) is a 16-year-old nonprofit organization that expands opportunity for people living in poverty by supporting microfinance and other sustainable solutions in Latin America. As of June 30, 2010, GP had $37.7 million invested in 27 microfinance institutions, which in turn provide microcredit and other services to more than 845,000 borrowers. Find out more at www.globalpartnerships.org.

More information:

Backgrounder on Social Investment Fund 2010 (pdf)

1-minute animation of how the investment fund model works

Microcapital Q&A with GP CEO Rick Beckett on GP’s strategy, June 2010

How Do Americans Feel about U.S. Foreign Aid And the Millennium Development Goals?

Both the Senate and the House Appropriation Committees have recently approved a cut in the FY2011 foreign aid budget, despite pleas from many, including Secretary Clinton.  The amounts approved are $54.06 billion by the Senate and $52.6 billion by the House; both lower than the $56.6 billion requested by the Obama Administration.  In the atmosphere of budget deficits and economic constraints, the cut did not come as a surprise.   However, as the 2015 deadline for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) is soon approaching, the need for continuing U.S. efforts to reach these goals has never been greater.  There is a conflict here, between the great need for foreign aid, and the current economic difficulties.  It leads us to ask: do Americans identify with the urgent need to continue to provide foreign aid to meet the MDGs?  Also, do Americans agree with the international development community on the U.S. responsibility to contribute to the millennium development goals?  

To answer these questions, a national poll was conducted in April 2010 by Public Opinion Strategies and Hart Research, on behalf of the United Nations Foundation.  It surveyed American’s attitudes toward foreign aid and the MDGs.  Here are some key findings:

  • – For the first time in five years, Americans’ view of the United Nations (UN) rose from above 50% favorable to 60% favorable.  This increase in positive impressions of the UN is due to the positive stories they have seen in the news on events such as the Haiti relief effort, humanitarian efforts in Africa, relief efforts in Chile and Peru, WHO humanitarian efforts, UNICEF humanitarian efforts and the earthquake relief effort in China. 
  •  – Two-thirds of Americans believe the UN is still needed today.
  •  – 59% of Americans believe international issues have an impact on them personally and only 15% believe international issues have no personal impact on them.
  •  – Although 89% of Americans say they are not familiar with the specifics of the MDGs, after hearing a brief description of the eight goals, 87% of Americans believe the U.S. should be very or somewhat involved in a worldwide effort to accomplish the MDGs by 2015.  50% of Pacific residents stated that the U.S. should be very involved in accomplishing the MDGs.
  •  – When asked to choose which MDGs are the most important to accomplish, Americans chose those goals that address the most basic human needs for survival.
  •  – The top 3 choices for the most important MDGs were: access to safe drinking water (47%), alleviating extreme hunger and poverty (36%), and eliminating gender disparity in completing primary education (27%).

Though it is discouraging to know that a huge majority (89%) of Americans are unfamiliar with the MDGs, one positive realization did emerge from this rather negative finding.    Most Americans are supportive of U.S. involvement in accomplishing the MDGs once they learn about the specifics.  If we want to accelerate our progress towards meeting the MDGs by 2015, one thing we cannot undermine is the power of the collective action from this majority of Americans.  In addition to the strategy that the U.S. government has recently mapped out for meeting the MDGs (see recent blog post), we need to educate and engage our communities, local leaders of all sectors, local media and audience about this collective responsibility toward eliminating global poverty.  We can start by taking part in the 2010 Stand Up Against Poverty movement, when individuals and organizations around the world will stand up and make noise against poverty around September 17th, 2010.

Tech-Aid: Innovation and Development

As Global Washington’s Conversation with USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah came to a close last Friday, Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA) left the audience with a new way of looking at an old question.

As Congressman McDermott explained, when faced with contemplating the future of global development, one can readily apply the age-old question “is the glass half-full or half-empty?” Similarly, we can ask ourselves is this the time in world history that the human race bands together to solve the critical problems of our time, or will we allow the global financial crisis to stifle our humanitarian spirit and maintain the status quo? Can we capitalize on the momentum building up to the Millennium Development Goals and eradicate hunger, disease, and extreme poverty, or are we setting ourselves up for a big disappointment with such lofty goals?

But these questions, however important, are insufficient in finding the solutions to the world’s ills. To solve these problems, Congressman McDermott exhorted the audience to consider how to fill the glass, rather than consider how full it is already. Indeed we must not ask ourselves if we will succeed, but how we will succeed in meeting the basic needs of all. And technology is inevitably a part of the answer to that question.

Such was the purpose of this panel discussion. Bringing together the USAID Administrator, two Congressmen, and representatives from Microsoft, Washington State University, PATH, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the panel discussed the role innovation and technology plays in development projects, particularly in the health and agriculture sectors.

Before introducing Dr. Shah, Congressman Adam Smith (D-WA) opened the discussion with a case for investment in development, saying funding foreign assistance can create a more stable and secure global environment. However, as Congressman Smith pointed out, the current foreign assistance structure is not efficient enough to get the most out of our resources.

Dr. Shah echoed Congressman Smith’s sentiments on the state of the foreign aid system, saying that programs are too often ineffective because projects are not guided by results and evidence from the ground. Fortunately, Dr. Shah has committed to basing programs off of conditions on the ground, beginning with the two new development initiatives Feed the Future, and the Global Health Initiative.

Using the right technology and the right means of delivering that technology may ultimately decide the success or failure of many development programs. Innovative new pieces of technology have already played a large role in improving development programs. For instance, M-Pesa allows you to safely and securely transfer money via cell phone, giving people without steady access to a bank a way to easily access their money.

With such promising technological innovations and committed leadership from our panelists, I can’t help but see that glass filling up quickly.

New U.S. Strategy for Meeting the Millennium Development Goals

The Obama administration recently released the U.S. Strategy for Meeting the Millennium Development Goals, a 28-page document that emphasizes innovation, sustainability, and accountability.  After a brief recap of progress achieved to date and the serious challenges ahead, the document outlines the three pillars of the U.S. strategy: innovate, sustain, and make it work.  According to the strategy, innovation can be a “powerful force multiplier,” and can be fostered in many ways: funding research, expanding access to technology, building partnerships, and stimulating innovation through prizes and the like.  The key to ensuring sustainability is found in broad-based economic growth, well-governed institutions, investments in women and girls, sustainable service-delivery systems, and mitigating shocks.  And to make it all work, the U.S. must build the enabling environment through strengthened monitoring & evaluation, accountability, and coordination with other donors.

In order to put these ideas into practice, the strategy promises to “marshal the full range of our development policy instruments.”  This includes pledges to fund innovation, invest in sustainability, and improve accountability.

Many of the initiatives discussed in the strategy are ongoing efforts that the U.S. government has worked on for years.  Some are newer, such as the Feed the Future and the Global Health Initiative.  There is not much news in this new document.

One new and promising initiative in this strategy document is a major aid transparency initiative, where the U.S. government will work with other donors and partner governments to streamline the dissemination of country-level information about aid flows.  If this works as planned, it will make it a lot easier to figure out who is doing what in each country, what money is being spent on which project where, and what the expected and measured results are.

What is missing from this strategy?  Any mention of who is in charge- who will coordinate this government-wide response?  If no one is in charge, there can be no real accountability.  Also, there is no talk of a Global Development Strategy, which is widely recognized as an important step towards greater transparency and accountability.  In general, this strategy is sparse on details, and leaves much to the imagination.

For more commentary on this strategy, see the Devex rundown here.

To read the full strategy document, click here.

Another Step on the Path to Reform

It has been nearly 50 years since the U.S. foreign assistance system was formally established through the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA). In that time, the structure of U.S. foreign assistance has become bloated and unwieldy. Currently, 12 Departments and 25 government agencies are charged with implementing foreign aid policy as defined through over 400 development objectives. To complicate things further, numerous amendments to the FAA and over 20 additional pieces of legislation were passed to direct U.S. foreign aid in the time since the FAA’s passage. With such a muddled structure, it is no wonder U.S. foreign assistance has come under assault in recent years, as calls for serious reforms have continued to mount. Luckily, reform efforts are moving ahead at full steam.

Two weeks ago, Representative Howard Berman, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced the first two sections, or preamble, of a draft of the Foreign Assistance Act rewrite. This draft marks an important step in the process of overhauling the U.S. foreign aid system to make it more coherent and effective in achieving the goals of global development. While the preamble is meant more as a formative document, designed to provide the development community with a first glance and guide a discussion, it offers insight into some of the new initiatives and strategies to be included in the final draft.

For the most part, this draft presents a broad picture of the direction in which the reform effort is moving. Through a declaration of general principles, policies, and goals of U.S. foreign assistance, the preamble offers insight to the guiding tenets of the reform process. Within these broad principles and goals, all four of Global Washington’s principles of effective development are accounted for: coherence and coordination, transparency and accountability, local ownership, and targeting aid to those most in need.

To ensure coherence and coordination, the draft calls for a streamlined foreign assistance structure to clearly delineate authority and responsibilities and to ensure consistency across all policy areas.

In order to improve transparency and accountability, the draft’s “principles of assistance” include a call for improved monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, as well as the need for detailed information regarding foreign aid budget and expenditures.

With regards to local ownership of aid projects, the preamble offers several principles to increase local capacity and ensure local ownership of development programs. According to this draft, it should be the policy of the U.S. government to develop assistance programs in partnership with local stakeholders that increase local capacity in the government and civil society. As a result, foreign assistance programs can be more effective and sustainable.

As a means of ensuring aid is targeted at those most in need, the preamble recommends that assistance be based on “poverty measurement tools and gender analysis.” Included in such measurement tools would be, among others, the Human Development Index rankings, per capita incomes, local capacity, and prior performance records.

Apart from the statement of general principles and policies, the preamble does introduce new, specific initiatives and organizational structures. Most important amongst the specific items in this draft is the designation of a national development strategy to guide foreign assistance activities and to ensure coherence across all foreign policy objectives.

The preamble also suggests that a rewritten Foreign Assistance Act would establish Development Support Funds to provide the USAID Administrator with the authority and resources to provide assistance to developing nations that will support local capacity and ensure aid is targeted at those most in need. Such an initiative offers stark contrast to the current policy planning strategy. Instead of using sector-specific goals and objectives to guide development policy, USAID would be afforded the flexibility needed to create effective programs.

To ensure that development activities reflect the needs and priorities in the field, each Development Support Fund will contribute a percentage of its funding to the administration of Country Investment Strategies for Development. Each Country Investment Strategy for Development will be prepared every three to five years by each USAID Mission Director. This is another departure from the previous policy of allowing specific goals and objectives to guide development policy. As a result, conditions in the field would inform the creation of development policy much more significantly than in the past, making programming more flexible and responsive to the needs in the field.

Paramount to the success of any reformed foreign assistance structure is consistency and coherence. In an effort to ensure development policy is consistent throughout the government, a rewritten Foreign Assistance Act would create a newly established Development Policy Committee. Such a committee would be composed of the USAID Administrator and a representative from each department and agency that has a stake in global development such as the Departments of Agriculture, State, and Defense, as well as at least eleven others.

While this draft is a mere outline of what a rewritten Foreign Assistance Act will look like, it provides a great deal of hope that reform is truly within reach. However, with only a few weeks of legislative business to go before Congress recesses for the mid-term elections, whether the new Foreign Assistance Act will even be considered in this Congress remains to be seen.

To review the draft preamble in its entirety, please follow the link here. To read more about Global Washington and our recommendations for a reformed foreign assistance structure, please visit the Policy Work section of our website.

Village Reach 
Announces
 National
 Expansion
 Of
 Last
 Mile 
Health
 Program In
 Mozambique

Village Reach 
Announces
 National
 Expansion
 Of
 Last
 Mile 
Health
 Program
In
 Mozambique

New
 funding 
appeal 
targets 
$4
million 
to
 support 
six year 
program
Charity 
evaluator
 Give Well 
continues 
to 
rate
 Village Reach 
its
 #1
 charity

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, July 27, 2010 VillageReach, the Seattle‐based social enterprise that increases access to healthcare for remote, last mile communities in low‐income countries,
today announced a $5.6 million program to strengthen the national health system in
Mozambique. Contributions for the six‐year program total $1.2 million to date. The new
program is supported by the Mozambique Ministry of Health ‐ MISAU – and follows a successful
five‐year demonstration project of the VillageReach vaccine and medical commodities
distribution model. Results of the demonstration project recorded improved population
vaccination rates from 68% to 95%, with corresponding cost decreases of as much as 20%.

VillageReach also announced today that GiveWell, the independent, non‐profit charity evaluator,
will continue to rate VillageReach its #1 charity. To date, more than 400 domestic and
international charities have been reviewed. GiveWell conducted an extensive review of
VillageReach to evaluate the Mozambique program in terms of its impact and cost effectiveness
in saving lives. See www.givewell.org for the VillageReach review.

The Mozambique challenge

Mozambique has a national vaccination coverage rate of 72%, significantly below the World
Health Organization’s (WHO) goal of 90%. Like many low‐income countries, Mozambique
suffers from high child mortality rates. UNICEF estimates that for every 1000 live births in
Mozambique, 154 children will die before they turn five, many from vaccine‐preventable
diseases. In addition to low vaccination rates, Mozambique has a weak and poorly resourced
health system to support its population of 23 million. Rural health facilities are geographically
isolated and chronically understaffed.

The VillageReach Model

VillageReach strengthens health systems in low‐income countries by designing new approaches
to address common rural health infrastructure challenges. VillageReach combines proven
practices in logistics and supply chain management with new approaches for health system
performance measurement, supervision, and information management to build new models
that meet the unique challenges found in last‐mile settings. As a result, frontline health workers
can dedicate more time each day to saving lives, more families can be served, and community
confidence in rural health systems increases. For more information on the VillageReach model
and details of the Mozambique program, see www.villagereach.org.

“In our view, VillageReach has developed a unique approach to saving lives, and is the best
organization we’ve found by the criteria of proven impact, cost‐effectiveness and scalability,”
said Holden Karnofsky, co‐founder of GiveWell. “We reiterate our #1 rating for VillageReach
and its Mozambique program because of this demonstrated effectiveness, and in recognition of
the organization’s efforts to be as transparent as possible to its donors.”

“We are engaged in an ambitious initiative to demonstrate that improving logistics for health
systems in low‐income countries is highly effective and can have lasting impact to benefit
millions across a national population,” said Allen Wilcox, president of VillageReach. “We take
great pride in GiveWell’s evaluation and appreciate the insight their independent assessment
can provide for donors seeking non‐profit organizations that openly document both their
challenges and results.”

About VillageReach

VillageReach is a non‐profit social enterprise that extends the reach of healthcare services to
remote, underserved communities by creating dynamic delivery and information monitoring
systems. Its mission is to save lives and improve well being in developing countries by
increasing last‐mile access to healthcare and investing in social businesses that address gaps in
community infrastructure.

Local Organizations Weigh In On Global Summit Failures

“FOR most Seattle residents, global hunger seems like an impossible problem to solve. Reports of famine in Niger or the thousands at risk for starvation and malnutrition in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, seem not only far away but impossible to change. A local organization, however, begs to differ.”

Local Organizations Weigh In On Global Summit Failures
The Seattle Times |  Danielle Nierenberg and Molly Theobald | July 26, 2010

Ultra Rice: Whatcom County Invention Holds Hope For Health

“A simple bowl of white rice sits on a conference table inside the Seattle headquarters of global-health nonprofit PATH…For every 100 grains of rice, the bowl contains one grain of Ultra Rice. It’s actually not rice at all, but pasta fortified with vitamins and minerals and squeezed through a rice-shaped mold. The manufactured grains are made from a mixture of rice flour, nutrients and binding agents derived from seaweed.”

Ultra Rice: Whatcom County Invention Holds Hope For Health
The Seattle Times |  Kristi Heim | July 24, 2010

Millennium Development Goals: Only 5 years to go, are we on track?

With 5 years left to 2015, the target date for achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), is the world on track for achieving these goals?  Has the economic crisis in 2008 affected the progress? The good news is that though the global economic crisis has slowed progress, the world is still on track.  However, the 2010 progress report issued by the United Nations illustrated that success is uneven across the various goals.  While a number of goals are expected to be achieved, the UN still urges a major push forward by all international development partners to reach all of the goals.  UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon brought this key message to the G20 summit in Canada last month, urging world leaders to keep their promise and not to “balance budgets on the backs of the world’s poorest people.”  As a result of Mr. Ban’s urgent message, the next G20 summit in November 2010 will include development on the agenda for the first time.  Also, the UN MDGs summit will take place in two months in New York. A concrete action plan is expected to emerge to accelerate the realization of the commitments world leaders promised in 2000.

According to the 2010 UN Progress Report on the MDGs, goals in the following areas are expected to be reached with current trends:

  • – Poverty reduction
  • – Sustainable access to safe drinking water
  • – Developing countries gaining greater access to the markets of developed countries

Some progress has been made in the areas below, but much more work needs to be done in order for these goals to be realized by 2015:

  • – Universal primary education
  • – Reducing child and maternal mortality
  • – Stabilizing the spread of HIV and AIDS-related deaths
  • – Malaria prevention and treatment
  • – Forest conservation
  • – Information and communications technology penetrating in the developing world

 If the world does not expedite progress in these areas, we may not reach these goals:

  • – Ending hunger
  • – Gender equality
  • – Funding in family planning
  • – Ensuring environmental sustainability
  • – Increase in official development assistance

 All in all, in each of the target areas, extraordinary attention is demanded to eliminate the “stubborn gaps,” as described by Mr. Ban, between rich and poor, urban and rural, and men and women.

 To view the full version of the UN MDGs 2010 report, please click here.

July 2010 Newsletter


Welcome to the July 2010 issue of the Global Washington newsletter. If you would like to contact us directly, please email us.

IN THIS ISSUE

Note from our Executive Director

Bookda Gheisar

Greetings,

It’s been wonderful to see so many of you at Global Washington’s recent events. This summer, the spirit of our global development community has felt especially collaborative and committed to positioning our state as a leader in global development work.

In early July, our policy paper “Global Development through Aid, Partnerships, Trade and Education: Recommendations from Global Washington” brought together over 400 people from the sector. Senator Cantwell demonstrated enthusiastic support for the policy recommendations, and pledged to take the recommendations to her colleagues in the Senate and the Obama administration. Many of you contributed to this paper, and its success is a reflection of all of your hard work and dedication.

Global Washington’s Second Annual Conference on November 15 & 16 promises to build on this collective approach. Our theme this year is Bridges to Breakthroughs: How partnerships and innovation are changing the world. Our amazing Conference Planning Committee and I are in the process of putting together an informative and inspiring event that features thought leaders and luminaries in the global development sector. Early registration begins July 29th!

We continue to seek out new ways to deepen our commitment and programming to the global development community in Washington State. You are all doing valuable work in the field, and Global Washington aims to provide a space for you to exchange ideas, share best practices, and troubleshoot challenges with other individuals and organizations in the sector doing similar work.

Thank you for supporting the vision and mission of Global Washington. I wish you a wonderful summer, and I hope to see you soon!

In unity,

Bookda Gheisar, Executive Director

Featured Organization: Clear Path International

For centuries, wars have been disrupting the daily lives of innocent civilians. But whileconflicts may have an official ending, the terrors of war often linger long after hostilities end. One of the most frightening remnants of war is the existence of minefields and unexploded ordnance blanketing former battlefields. Mines kill or wound an innocent civilian nearly every 30 minutes, killing or seriously injuring 15,000 to 20,000 people a year.

Landmine and unexploded ordnance accidents pose serious impacts on the survivors, their families, and their communities. Survivors of landmine and bomb explosions are often left severely injured, both physically and financially. Injuries sustained from a mine accident often prevent the victim from pursuing education or work opportunities, leaving families without a much needed income.

Given that the majority of minefields and unexploded ordnance reside in the developing world, the impacts of explosions are even more pronounced. Local communities do not usually have the resources to treat land mine victims’ physical and psychological injuries. Thus, it is the mission of Clear Path International (CPI) to serve not only the victims of landmine and bomb explosions, but their families and communities as well, to ensure victims are able to reenter their community with renewed confidence.

Founded in October of 2000, CPI initially focused its efforts solely on the heavily mined area surrounding the former Demilitarized Zone in central Vietnam. Here, Martha and James Hathaway, Imbert Matthee, and Kristen Leadem saw the terrifying results of landmine explosions and decided to join together to ease the suffering of landmine accident survivors. At first, CPI incorporated de-mining into its assistance activities, but later abandoned it to focus on landmine survivor assistance.

After a year of successfully helping to rehabilitate landmine accident survivors in Vietnam, CPI began to expand in 2001. First, CPI spread its operations to Cambodia, where decades of civil war has left the country with the largest per-capita population of mine amputees in the world. Then, in 2002, CPI expanded to reach Burmese refugee landmine accident survivors on the Thai-Burma border. More recently, CPI opened operations in Afghanistan where around 60 landmine accidents are reported each month.

To assist in the rehabilitation process, CPI offers a variety of services customized to the needs of each landmine or unexploded ordnance survivor. Paramount to the survival of the victims of landmine explosions, medical attention must be attained as quickly as possible. To ensure the initial survival of landmine and bomb explosions, CPI provides access to emergency medical care, access to hospitals and life-saving surgery.

Often, survivors of landmine explosions lose limbs and are thus at a serious disadvantage in the pursuit of education and work. To counter these impacts of landmine accidents, CPI helps victims attain prosthetics and helps to provide survivors with access to physical rehabilitation programs. As a way to help accident survivors reenter the workforce and secure a reliable income, CPI provides employment assistance through vocational skills training and scholarships.

In order to implement this assistance strategy, CPI partners with community organizations and local leaders. With the exception of Vietnam, where CPI is more hands-on, implementation of the projects is left up to the local partners while CPI provides financial, capacity building, and technical assistance. In Cambodia for example, the Phum Seam Farmers’ Cooperative and Rice Mill was established in 2006 to provide socio-economic and agricultural support to landmine survivors in three districts in northwestern Cambodia. This community, located in the K-5 mine belt, is one of the hardest hit by Cambodia’s recent history of genocide and civil war. CPI and its partner Cambodian Volunteers for Community Development have served over 3000 beneficiaries through the activities of the rice mill and farmers’ cooperative, vocational training and micro-credit lending programs.

In the future, CPI is planning to expand further to meet the needs of landmine survivors in Laos and Lebanon. Also possible in the future is a revival of mine clearance activities on a more responsive, small-scale basis.

The impact CPI has on the lives of landmine and unexploded ordnance survivors is undeniable. Through lifesaving medical treatment, access to physical rehabilitation, and educational and employment opportunities, CPI enables survivors to go about their daily lives without disruption.

To learn more about Clear Path International and their integral lifesaving activities, please visit the CPI website.

top

Changemaker: Steve Crane – Making a Difference Through Innovation

“Paths are made by walking” has been the guiding principle for Steve Crane’s work as a changemaker.

From expanding Washington State government’s’ international program focus to building new Rotary partnerships in Zambia, Steve is an envoy for Washington’s global development efforts. He is a strong believer in building opportunities and encouraging collaboration through business, trade, and innovative public-private partnerships.

When asked about the origin of his interest in fostering development through trade, Steve recalled his frustration with the trend toward econometrics in economic theory at the time of his undergraduate studies.  That was not about refining theories to better predict real people’s behavior, which was Steve’s sense of how economics should be used.  He wanted to learn how disadvantaged people can be empowered to change their lives.  At Stanford and John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, he worked with third world development practitioners whose advice was changing the economic prospects of poor countries.

Steve entered the business world believing that corporations can be agents of positive, sustainable change in the lives of the communities where they operate.  At NCR Corporation, he convinced senior management that they should have a host country relations policy in the developing countries where NCR was doing business.  That new initiative encouraged Steve’s later work on public-private partnerships and corporate social responsibility.

In the early 1970s, trade’s importance to Washington State was not widely understood. To change this, Steve had a key role in establishing the Washington Council on International Trade.  WCIT educated public officials, high school teachers and the public at large about trade’s critical role in Washington’s future.  In the late 1970s, Steve joined the senior management at AFS International, a leading high school student exchange program, to increase their funding.  He initiated corporate partnerships in Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Japan, and Southeast Asia, building on company’s interest in hiring graduates with experience living abroad. This campaign raised over $6 million to support sending African students to homes and schools in these countries and here in the United States, enriching the program’s diversity.

Steve’s innovative mindset has led to many first-of-its-kind projects leveraging Washington State’s resources to make an impact on developing countries, especially in Asia.   In the 80’s, as the head of the International Division of the Washington State Department of Commerce, Steve staged the State’s first major international conference that featured trade and investment opportunities in Southeast Asia. In 1991, he convinced business colleagues and Seattle City officials to establish the Seattle-Surabaya (Indonesia) Sister City relationship based on mutual development interests.  That led to the exchange of trade delegations that included State, City and Port officials who had never traveled to the other country. It also fostered a partnership between Seattle’s and Surabaya’s water utilities to introduce water quality control policies there.

Following his wide-range of accomplishments at a variety of private companies, non-profit organizations and state government, Steve continued his change-making efforts by founding his own consulting company, Crane International Inc.  He remains an active participant in national and local committees contributing to global development.  In 1999, Steve arranged a Seattle visit by World Bank President James Wolfensohn as a guest of the City and WCIT.  That visit led to engaging the City, UW, and business leaders in a Sister City partnership with the Haiphong (Vietnam) City government and the World Bank to improve their services and tourism prospects.  Steve chairs the trade policy committee providing advice to Global Washington on its recently published Policy Paper – “Global Development through Trade, Aid, Education, and Partnerships: Recommendations from Global Washington.”

Steve is also the co-chair of the International Service Committee (ISC) of Seattle Rotary, which manages a diverse project portfolio of Rotary partnerships abroad to empower less advantaged people to significantly improve their lives.  Seattle Rotary is the largest and fourth oldest Rotary Club in the world, which, Steve believes, offers ISC members a special opportunity and responsibility to lead project partnerships.

For example, the ISC is now steering an exciting malaria control pilot project in Zambia in partnership with Rotary Clubs there and with PATH.  This project will build individual Club partnerships with Seattle-area Clubs and support the formation of a Zambia-based steering committee to plan and oversee their malaria control activities.  Zambian Clubs will work with local government health workers and leaders to train and equip neighboring communities to prevent malaria.  Combined with other anti-malaria work in Zambia, this partnership aims to engage Rotarians in the campaign to eradicate malaria there.  It also is building a model for Rotarians to work with governments and NGOs on a national scale in other countries.

Another current ISC project is restoring their water supply to tribal mountain villages north of Mumbai, India.  A partnership with a Mumbai Rotary Club, a local NGO and other US Clubs is empowering villagers to restore their depleted aquifer by capturing monsoon rainfall runoff.  Steve enthusiastically explained that with the contour bunds and mini-dams villagers are building, “valuable topsoil will be saved, well pumps will draw water again, wasteland will be converted to kitchen gardens and fruit orchards, jobs will be created, agricultural output will be increased, and villagers’ health and education will be improved.”    These changes will be sustained by committees of local villagers with the support and oversight of Rotarians. The longer term objective Steve foresees is to “establish corporate partnerships that extend this model program to many more depleted aquifers and poor villages in India and, perhaps, to other countries in the developing world.”

During our interview, I could really feel Steve’s enthusiasm about Global Washington.   His first response to my question of what advice he would give to organizations or people who would like to contribute to the development sector is – “Join Global Washington!”  Aligned very closely with this belief in innovation and collaboration, Steve thinks that Global Washington’s strength lies in the exciting forums it provides to encourage new relationships to be formed, and new ideas to be fashioned and pursued with partners that have complementary skills and strengths.

If you are interested in learning more about Steve Crane’s works, you may email him at Craneintl@aol.com.

*Photo courtesy to Jim Moore.

 

Book Review

Up and Out of Poverty: The Social Marketing Solution
by Philip Kotler and Nancy R. Lee
2009 Wharton School Publishing
$29.91 Hardcover

Up and Out of Poverty offers readers a fascinating journey into the world of social marketing, a process which applies a mix of proven marketing principles and techniques to  benefit society as well as the target audience, and which uses “ constructive approaches to support desired behavior changes “.  Since its founding in the 1970’s social marketing has been used effectively to reduce tobacco usage, increase literacy, and advance a wide variety of social causes.  Authors Kotler and Lee now present a compelling case for incorporating social marketing as an integral component of poverty reduction solutions.

Packed with helpful information, this book is a valuable resource for new and seasoned actors in global development, who plan, implement or evaluate poverty reduction programs.  Employing a series of intriguing case studies throughout, the authors deconstruct poverty reduction programs from Kampala, Uganda to the streets of New York, clearly demonstrating the application of social marketing principles.

The book is divided into three parts, the first of which presents the poverty problem in broad terms, including current thinking about poverty solutions and 5 commonly accepted definitions of poverty. These range from the World Bank’s “absolute definition” of extreme poverty, as those living on less than $1.25 a day, to the Human Poverty Index, which takes into consideration the likelihood of a child not surviving to age 60, along with other key factors. The authors estimate we are looking at approximately 4 billion people living in extreme, moderate or relative poverty, with “90% living in Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia, and South Asia”.

Kotler and Lee present and assess four traditional, strategic paths for reducing poverty: economic growth, redistribution, foreign aid and population control. They advocate convincingly for a more multilateral approach to poverty reduction solutions, which incorporate a social marketing mind-set, and emphasizes “a fundamental principle underlying marketing – understanding the market segments and each segment’s potential needs, wants, beliefs, problems, concerns, and related behaviors”.

Social marketing, unlike commercial marketing, focuses on behavior rather than on goods and services. The competition is the undesirable behavior rather than other businesses, and the end benefit is the wellbeing of the target audiences and society as a whole, rather than investor wealth. Social marketers want to influence audiences to accept, reject, modify or discard particular behaviors.

In Part II, “Applying Social Marketing Perspective s and Solutions” we see how five social marketing tools support poverty-reduction programs. These tools include: “segmenting the market, evaluating and choosing target market priorities, determining desired behaviors, identifying barriers, benefits and competitors, and developing a desired positioning and strategic marketing mix based on the Four Ps – product, price, place and promotion – to encourage adoption of behaviors”.

One case study looks at Sri Lanka, a country wracked by malaria epidemics which “ reached a peak of 687,599 confirmed cases in 1987 – yet in 2007 there were only 196 – and no deaths”. The product strategy used began in the 1950 with extensive indoor spraying and significant community resistance. Community acceptance increased with the advent of selective spraying based on a variety of more refined assessments. Mosquito nets helped reducing the need for spraying in high risk areas, outreach mobile clinics were brought in to speed detection and treatment, and diagnostic kits provided to medical practitioners helped identify the disease for malaria patients without access to laboratory facilities.

Part III provides a well organized framework for developing a strategic plan in 10 steps, referring to Peru’s efforts to reduce the incidence of TB, to illustrate each stage. The discussion then moves to the roles that government, the non-profit sector, and the private sector play in poverty reduction, and an introduction to key actors in the field, such as CARE, Population Services International (PSI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Kotler and Lee demonstrate how anti-poverty programs can be improved through a multi-lateral approach which more effectively links government, NGOs, and private companies. They make a strong case that “adding a marketing mind-set, principles, and tools will help achieve a new level of effectiveness in planning and implementing poverty-reduction programs”.

top

Updates to the Global Washington Website

We’ve made some changes and beautified our website! We’ve updated the look and the featured content gallery on the front page, and improved navigation. Here are some features we’ve added to to showcase the work of our members and supporters:

  • A Blogroll connecting you to the work of our members and supporters.
  • Links to social networking sites.
  • A “Publications” page, which allows you to read about Global Washington-sponsored research and reports on current global development work underway in the Washington State.
  • A “Reports from the Field” section we are currently building to showcase the work our members and supporters are engaged in around the world.
  • An “In the News” section to keep our community up to date on media coverage in the sector.

We hope you enjoy the new additions and streamlining!

top

Announcements

Seattle International Foundation Now Accepting Applications for the 2010 Global Grants Program

As of July 15, 2010, the Seattle International Foundation is now accepting applications for round 2 of the 2010 Global Grants Program.  The Global Program is designed to provide resources to non-profits based in the Puget Sound region with a global reach. The Foundation is interested in development projects throughout the world. Please see SIF’s website for How to Apply, eligibility requirements and to download an application (www.seaif.org).

Also, SIF is now accepting cover letters and resumes for a Social Media/Program Support intern. Please see their idealist post for more information.


Puget Sound Investors Realize Social and Financial Returns from Microfinance Investment Fund

Global Partnerships (GP), a Seattle-based nonprofit that invests in high-performing, socially focused microfinance institutions in Latin America, announced that the cycle of its first $2 million microfinance investment fund has been completed, less than five years after the fund was closed. As of last week, Global Partnerships had repaid all investors to Microfinance Fund 2005, either on time or early, with interest.

“This is a watershed moment,” said Rick Beckett, president and CEO of Global Partnerships. “When GP closed our first fund, we were testing the idea that an investment fund strategy could help us reach more people living in poverty and provide social and financial returns for investors. Five years later, we have launched three funds and have $39 million invested in microfinance institutions serving more than 800,000 people with affordable microcredit and other innovative solutions.”

Global Partnerships, founded in 1994, created its first fund, Microfinance Fund 2005 (MFF05), after realizing that philanthropic capital alone would not be sufficient to meet the demand for affordable microfinance capital. Like GP’s two subsequent funds, MFF05 was a five-year debt fund that leveraged philanthropic dollars to raise resources from qualified individual and institutional investors, and then loaned that capital to select microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Latin America.

More information:
Q&A with Rick Beckett on Microcapital: http://bit.ly/dqv6QN

GP’s strategy page: http://www.globalpartnerships.org/sections/aboutus/aboutus_strategy.htm


Wing Luke Museum Exhibit: A Refugee’s Journey of Survival and Hope

See life through the eyes of a refugee through personal stories, moving photographs and multimedia. Hear first-hand accounts of how refugees survived war, violence and oppression with hopes for a better future for their families. Ponder the trials of starting a life with nothing, in strange places and foreign cities, and having to call this new place a home. The exhibit was developed with a committee of refugees, children of refugees and service providers who work with refugees. Our community partners include the IRC, OneAmerica, NWIRP, ACRS, and many others.

Here is a little more information on the exhibit and sponsors: http://wingluke.org/exhibitions/special.htm

You can also listen to interviews of refugees on KBCS radio: http://kbcsweb.bellevuecollege.edu/downloads/VOD/VOD_20100519.mp3


Bring the Power of Digital Storytelling into Your Classroom

Bridges to Understanding’s popular one-day workshop for middle and high school teachers, “Bring the Power of Digital Storytelling into Your Classroom,” is taking place on  Saturday, September 25, 2010, 8:45 am to 5:00 pm, in Seattle.  Participants will learn how to teach their students to produce digital stories about their lives, communities and common global issues, and then share them with their peers around the world.

Aligned with 21st Century Learning Skills, EdSteps’ Global Competence Matrix, and State and Federal standards, the Bridges classroom curriculum includes student activities for cultural identity and values exploration and reflection, photography, script writing, research, recording audio and multimedia digital story production. Participants will learn how to access Bridges’ youth-produced digital stories and curriculum guides online, many of which are in Spanish as well as English, and to introduce their students to the cultures and communities of their peers in Bridges’ network of partner classrooms in Peru, Guatemala, India, South Africa and other countries around the world.

Fee: $175. Two scholarships are available for currently active middle and high school teachers. To register: www.bridges2understanding.org. For more information and to apply for a scholarship: Tania Westby, Program Director, tania@bridges2understanding.org. Registration deadline: September 17, 2010.


Global Health & Innovation Conference

Conference registration is now open.  For those interested in presenting at the conference, the first abstract deadline is August 15.

GH/Innovate 2011
Global Health & Innovation Conference
Presented by Unite For Sight, 8th Annual Conference
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Saturday, April 16 – Sunday, April 17, 2011

http://www.uniteforsight.org/conference

“A Meeting of Minds”–CNN

Unite For Sight’s must-attend, thought-leading conference convenes leaders, changemakers, and participants from all fields of global health, international development, and social entrepreneurship.  The conference convenes 2,200 people from all 50 states and from 50 countries.

Conference registration is now open. Register during July to secure the lowest registration rate. The registration rate increases after July.


Advanced  Screening of Grameen America Documentary “To Catch a Dollar”

Did you get a chance to see Muhammad Yunus when he was in Seattle last May?  When he spoke at Seattle’s Town Hall, he showed a trailer for “To Catch a Dollar” – a new documentary coming out about his work reducing poverty, with a close look at how the Grameen Bank has launched in America, starting in Queens, New York.

That night a few of us offered to help.  Since then we’ve been having a great time coming together as the all-volunteer “TCAD Seattle,” organized around helping support the movie and its underlying cause: making poverty a thing of the past.

We would LOVE to have you join us!

We’re hosting our first fundraiser next Thursday (July 22), in Seattle, with a special pre-release screening of the movie and a Skype connection with the filmmaker, Gayle Ferraro.  It’s short notice, but if you can join us next Thursday eve, it would be wonderful to have you there.

Date & Time: Thursday, July 22, 6pm-9pm
Place: Morgan Stanley Conference Room, Two Union Square, 601 Union Street, 51st Floor, Seattle 98101
RSVP to: Fortunato Vega – fortunato.vega@morganstanley.com or (206) 336-1611
We only have a few dozen seats left at the moment, so if you can come, please RSVP now for however many seats you want!



Americans for UNFPA’s Summer Program

Summer Evening: Thursday, July 22, 2010 / 6:00pm – 8:30pm

Summer Breakfast: Friday, July 23, 2010 / 8:30am – 10:00am

 

Women & Work in Pakistan and Afghanistan

Join us for an eye-opening conversation with Dr. Amy Ramm, an international expert on labor programs and how to empower women economically. Dr. Ramm will speak on her recent work in Pakistan and Afghanistan as well as her experiences as a delegate with Americans for UNFPA in Cambodia and India.

Women’s Health Care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Dr. Yvette Mulongo provides health care to Congolese women. She is our invited honoree for the Americans for UNFPA 2011 Luncheon for the Health and Dignity of Women. Dr. Mulongo will not be here in July, but we will hear about her work in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and how UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund, supports women in her country. We will also have details of the March 8, 2011 luncheon, when Yvette will be in Seattle. Please join the Host Committee for the 2011 Luncheon – information will be provided at the July program.

Documentary: Taking Root

Lives for women in rural Kenya had become intolerable: they were walking longer distances for firewood, clean water had become scarce, the soil was disappearing from their fields, and their children were suffering from malnutrition. Wangari Maathai thought to herself, “Well, why not plant trees?” This film explores how through planting trees women in Kenya found themselves working successfully against deforestation, poverty, ignorance, embedded economic interests, and political oppression, until they became a national political force. We will show this 1 hour documentary.

Programs are at Gemma Daggatt’s studio on Lake Union

933 North Northlake Way, Unit # 17, Seattle, WA 98103

RSVP for either program by July 22nd

showe@americansforunfpa.org Phone: 206.282.4706 (leave message)

There is no charge for the events.

Events are sponsored by Americans for UNFPA. UNFPA provides women’s health care and promotes the rights of women around the world. It is the largest international source of such assistance. Americans for UNFPA builds moral, political and financial support for UNFPA within the United States.



Unitus talent unleashed!

Build your dream team of experienced international development professionals! The Unitus Alumni group has published www.unitusalumni.com to showcase individuals in Seattle, Nairobi, and Bangalore who were recently released after the sudden closure of their microfinance operations.  Log on with username unitus and password alumni or email Eliza Kelly with inquiries.

Please submit your events to our calendar!

top

Global Washington Events:

September 16

Mobile Technology: Revolutionizing Development from Washington to Ouagadougou

November 15 & 16

Global Washington’s Second Annual Conference—Bridges to Breakthroughs: How partnerships and innovation are changing the world

top

Other Events:

July 22

Advanced Screening of Grameen America’s Documentary “To Catch a Dollar”

July 22 & 23

Americans for UNFPA’s Summer Program

July 26 – July 28

Sustainability and Education Summer Institute

July 29

Emergency Preparedness Training for Domestic Violence Programs with Elaine Enarson

September 25

Bring the Power of Digital Storytelling into Your Classroom

top