With passage of the Fiscal Year 2011 Continuing Resolution appropriations bill in the House of Representatives, consideration of the stop-gap measure moves to the Senate. With the bill, the ever-growing debate on what to cut from the budget also heads to the Senate. Unfortunately, the U.S. International Affairs Budget lies directly in the cross hairs of the deficit hawks.

Maybe lawmakers scrambling to find budget cuts are emboldened to target foreign aid programs because the American public erroneously believes that 25% of the federal budget is spent on foreign aid. In fact, approximately 1% of the U.S. budget is committed to the International Affairs Budget.

Or, perhaps, as former Bush Administration speech writer Michael Gerson suggests, our elected officials are misguided in thinking our current budget crisis is because of spending “too much on bed nets and AIDS drugs,” and not because of “entitlements and aging population and health cost inflation.”

But why should Americans be interested in saving foreign aid programming in such a dire fiscal situation? Much is said about America’s moral imperative to invest in development programming. As a super power with the world’s largest economy and which is undeniably linked to the rest of the world, Americans have an obligation to look out for those less fortunate than ourselves. Those who, try as they might, are unable to break themselves from the cycles of poverty, disease, and violent conflict that ravage the developing world. We must help those that are at a distinct disadvantage from their counterparts in the developed world to continue America’s commitment to humanitarian values.

But let us forget for a moment that roughly 1 billion people live on $1.25 per day. Forget that 33.3 million people are currently living with HIV around the world, 1.8 million of which died in 2009 because of their disease. Forget that rising global food prices are the cause of 925 million people worldwide suffering from debilitating hunger. And let us certainly forget that through its foreign aid programs the United States can do something about it.

Instead, let us consider the value added to the American public through strong investment in global development. Without humanitarian values to back up our foreign aid budget, what is there to encourage lawmakers to fully fund global development activities? In other words, in such a difficult economic situation, what’s in it for us?

First, investing in the International Affairs Budget means investing in national security. By investing in programs such as Peacekeeping Operations, International Military Education and Training, International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement, and Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs, the U.S. is strengthening its national security and saving on costs of military engagement. These programs help cultivate strong diplomatic relations, stabilize conflict areas, and reduce the threats of terrorism and drug trafficking on America’s doorstep.

Military professionals and civilians alike agree that our development funding is a vital component to national security. In a letter to Congress in support of the International Affairs Budget, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen reasoned “the more significant the cuts, the longer military operations will take, and the more and more lives are at risk!” In an editorial published recently, Representative Steve Rothman went so far as to claim that because of the national security component of the development budget, “our foreign aid and diplomatic budget has a return on investment that is at least a thousand fold.”

More importantly, investing in the International Affairs Budget has a decided economic benefit for American businesses and the economy at large. Ensuring economic growth in the developing world opens markets to international trade. Because of the investment in out development programs, American businesses are able to penetrate these new markets more readily.

Take for example, the US Trade and Development Agency helps American companies to break into new markets by establishing links between the companies and potential export and trade opportunities. In 2010 alone, the USTDA funded activities that accounted for $2 billion in U.S. exports. The Overseas Private Investment Corporation finances and insures U.S. business ventures in emerging markets, at no cost to American taxpayers. Both of these agencies are vital components of the U.S. foreign assistance strategy as they are integral to economic growth in the development world as well as economic prosperity and job creation in the United States.

Without a robust International Affairs budget the United States is at a severe disadvantage in its quest for national security and economic prosperity.  We must combine these two reasons with the American legacy of humanitarian responsibility to truly harness the world’s potential and create stability. Because, in the end, a stable and prosperous world is a safe a prosperous United States.

If you walked into the dimly lit, wood-paneled room and listened to the fast-paced talk by Cynthia Koenig, you might be forgiven for thinking she just sounded like another one of those young, profit-oriented entrepreneurs looking for money from venture capitalists or other kinds of investors.

Koenig is, actually, one of those money-seeking young business types, except that the primary goal of her proposal is to make life a lot easier and safer for millions of poor women around the world.

Hence the Wello, a kind of goofy looking water-carrying wheel-barrel (no, that’s not a typo) that she and her colleague, Colm Fay, at the University of Michigan’s business school want to sell to poor people.

Saving time and money, for $25

Water collection and storage, it turns out, takes up a lot of time and resources for people (usually women) in poor communities around the world. The Wello is aimed at saving both, as well as providing a handy storage unit.

“We’ve identified India as the first market we’re going to enter,” she said during a pitch Thursday at the University of Washington.”We think this is rapidly scalable … with a social return on investment of $178.65.”

Okay, I admit I didn’t always follow everything being said. I know vaguely what is meant by a social return on investment, but I didn’t have time to ask Koenig how the Wello, which she estimates will initially sell for about $25, is calculated to have a social benefit of nearly $180 to an individual.

I didn’t have time because Koenig was just one of an amazing array of social entrepreneurs at the UW’s Foster School of Business’ Global Social Entrepreneurship Competition (GSEC). The event ran all week and ended Thursday.

Koenig’s Wello won the “global health” prize of $10,000 from the UW Global Health Department.

“Grand prize” for perhaps the most unpleasant presentation

Do you know what the phrase “flying toilet” means? Ugh.

For proposing a business-like approach to the global problem of poop, and the fact that people use plastic bags when no toilet’s available, David Auerbach and Anirudh Vallabhaneni, both from MIT’s Sloan School of Management, took home the $12,500 top honor, provided by the Seattle International Foundation and Microsoft.

Sanergy is the name of their project. Their idea, already being launched in the slums of Kenya, sounded a bit like how Starbucks would approach the problem — of figuring out how to make money from something that had for years been neglected (a cheap cup of coffee) as a major business opportunity.

“Our toilets have three key elements that users in slums say they value most,” said Auerbach, describing their market survey results from really crappy parts of Nairobi.

The MIT gang likely won because they seemed to have answers to all the judges’ questions about their business model, competition threats, pricing and logistics. The idea, which you can read about at their web site, is to set up numerous for-profit businesses that reward building public toilets, collecting waste and using the waste to create fertilizer and (through methane) electricity that can be sold back to local utilities. Very impressive.

Other impressive competitors at GSEC included:

• A gang of UW engineering students, represented by Pranoti Hiremath and Christopher Mount, devised a method for adapting cellphones for use as diagnostic devices in poor communities.
• A team from UC-Berkeley, NextDrop, also wants to use cellphones to help people in India find out (through text messaging) when the water utility will turn the water on. Intermittent water access is a big problem. The Berkeley team did win an award, sponsored my Microsoft
  for telecommunications strategies.
• Students from Dhaka, Bangladesh, proposed a business to manufacture inexpensive inhalers for the many poor people (several hundred million) who are impaired in their daily activities by asthma.

Wren McNally, who coordinates the competition for the UW’s Global Business Center, said interest in the GSEC contest has exploded in the last few years. Started in 2005, McNally said, the idea is to stimulate innovative and cross-disciplinary ideas aimed at enlisting business to solve some of the world’s toughest health, environmental, social and justice problems.

“In the last two years, we’ve seen a huge increase in applications,” she said. So far, McNally said, more than 1,400 students from 41 countries have participated in the contest.

Something is going on with this generation, she said. They’re not just interested in getting jobs, raising a family and collecting the standard assortment of material goods.

“They really do want to make things better,” McNally said. And one way do it is through business.

Young Biz Entrepreneurs Compete For Social Good
Tom Paulson | Humanosphere | February 18

Earlier this month at the Global Chiefs of Mission Conference, USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah spoke to 300 U.S. diplomats, who were brought home from around the world to strategize diplomacy and development goals laid out in the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR). During the conference, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton highlighted diplomacy as the front line of American foreign policy; Shah complemented her remarks by explaining the current goals of USAID and how US diplomats can help implement them.

Shah stressed the importance of development work, calling it “the forward defense of our national security.” He mentioned amazing progress in Southern Sudan, an 85% reduction in narcotics trade in Colombia, and the continued work towards an exit strategy in Afghanistan as examples of development work’s stabilizing effects on volatile nations. He also highlighted development in terms of future economic opportunities for the United States, saying “the bottom billion” will eventually “represent a large and growing middle class and will require us to be competitive in that context in order to have real economic opportunities.”

Shah went on to describe “USAID Forward,” which will move away from inefficient practices and instead focus on development strategies that are proven to have long-term, lasting value. He briefly described priorities in food security, global health, and economic growth and said that in these and other areas of focus, USAID is seeking to put in place “more effective, more modern, and more efficient strategies to get better results and better outcomes.” But in order to achieve these results, better partnership is needed; “our diplomats and our development experts need to hold hands and pursue these goals together.”

He concluded his speech by asking the chiefs of mission to engage with USAID activities happening in their countries and to have conversations about development goals with the leaders they encounter. He also asked for their assistance in implementing USAID’s new evaluation policy and procurement reforms, and requested that they think through how science and technology can be used as a tool for improvement.

To listen to or read a full transcript of Rajiv Shah’s remarks, visit: http://www.state.gov/s/c/remarks/155892.htm

Welcome to the February 2011 issue of the Global Washington newsletter. If you would like to contact us directly, please email us.

IN THIS ISSUE

• Note from our Executive Director
• Featured Story: International Education: More Critical Now Than Ever
• Featured Organization: China Tomorrow Education Foundation: A Better Future for Rural China
• Changemaker: Interview with Allan Paulson
• Announcements
• Global Washington Events
• Other Events

Note from our Executive Director

Greetings,

As we look ahead to the coming year I’m excited to give you an indication of what you can expect from Global Washington in 2011, as we seek more ways to support you on the Issues that define and drive your organization.

We continue to define our core purpose as serving as a catalyst for greater partnership and innovation for the Washington State international development community.

For the past two years, Global Washington has been working to highlight your efforts by hosting exchanges between you and other groups. We have seen increasing interest in our growing development community from Washington D.C., public and private sectors, and academia.

Global Washington has more than 130 members, most of whom are associated with one or more of these categories of development:  Education, Environment/Sustainability, Health, and Poverty Alleviation/Economic Development.

In 2011, we’re expanding our approach to provide you with more support around the issues that interest you most. To stimulate more meaningful exchanges and encourage greater collaboration between members, we will identify where your specific sector interests align with other development organizations academic institutions and corporations. We will be providing opportunities for you to exchange information, identify partnerships, and source support from organizations with similar strategic interest in your sector. The survey we sent you recently is an initial effort to assess your interests and priorities.

We have heard from many of you that you are interested in coming together and working in small groups. As a next step, we will create working groups for each sector and host events where you have the opportunity to share greater details of your work. Please feel free to contact me with your interest in contributing to this effort and helping us plan opportunities for this year that will provide you with the greatest benefit.

We will begin this sector work by greater focus on the education sector. As an organization active in the sector we look forward to engaging you to contribute to a more specific agenda on education for Global Washington to pursue . In the coming weeks I will be contacting you directly about opportunities to contribute to our working group and preparations for a summit on international education later this year.

In unity,

Bookda Gheisar, Executive Director

Featured Story: International Education: More Critical Now Than Ever

This year is bringing new and exciting opportunities for Global Washington members to shape a cohesive international education system in Washington State that will serve as a model for our nation.

Our nation’s investment in international education will profoundly affect our ability to address critical issues of global development, environmental sustainability and national security. We must better prepare students to enter the professional world as knowledgeable and competent global citizens. To accomplish this, our state needs a unified strategy and integrated international education system.

Washington’s current international education system is disorganized and segregated: K-12 and higher education institutions are disconnected from one another, without common curricula, benchmarks, requirements and priorities to prepare students to enter a globalized workforce and to become effective global citizens and leaders.

As participants in a broad-based, statewide coalition of academic institutions, non-profit organizations, and leading businesses—and with the support of state policymakers—Global Washington members are uniquely positioned to coordinate and build a shared strategy for international education.

Creating a roadmap for the future

Since 2008, Global Washington has convened education experts from across the state to identify avenues for collaboration to transform Washington State students into global citizens. Already, this group has compiled two invaluable resources (available at globalwa.org/resources/issue-areas/education):

• An inventory of global learning at the collegiate level, highlighting the tremendous diversity of global learning opportunities already available at Washington colleges and universities.
• A set of “Global Learning Goals for Higher Education” that have been endorsed by the presidents of 39 Washington State higher education institutions.

Building on this effort, Global Washington’s International Education Working Group has identified three topic areas critical to developing a cohesive, statewide international education system:

1. World Languages – There is a vital need in Washington to develop communication capabilities in world languages that are most important for the state. This includes identifying language priorities, teaching and learning pedagogies, and curriculum and program design.
2. Building a Global Classroom in the U.S. and Abroad – Washington State students must link with students in other parts of the world. To do so effectively requires:
   • pedagogy and desired learning outcomes for students’ interactions with one another;
   • technology and infrastructure for supporting these interactions;
   • best practices and lessons learned by independent schools in Washington State and transferring those to public school systems;
   • building schools abroad and exchanging educational best practices and lessons learned between Washington State and the developing world;
   • program design to facilitate global student interactions.
3. Pedagogy and Competence Building – As a state we must identify best practices for teaching intercultural skills to students and ensure that teachers are well prepared to provide effective global learning experiences for their students. This includes promoting specific goals, evaluation metrics and a vision for international education in Washington schools.

Mobilizing statewide action

Based on our successful experience to date, Global Washington sees a unique opportunity to emphasize K-12 and higher education as a strategy for fostering global engagement. Our priorities are driven by the statewide sense of urgency for programs that anticipate the future and equip our citizens to thrive and to lead in the coming decades.

But to move forward, we need your participation. There are three ways that you can get involved in this important work:

1. International Education Task Forces: We are currently convening three task forces focused on each of the critical topic areas described above. These task forces will bring together key stakeholders in the international education sector, who will identify the most important priorities in each area and translate those to specific policy recommendations.
2. Global Washington 2011 International Education Conference:Building Global Citizens and a Global Workforce through Education in September 2011. This conference will bring together more than 120 representatives from Washington government, business, non-profits, higher education and K-12 institutions with policymakers and thought leaders who contribute to the international education community. Together we will harness our united efforts, explore the most pressing international educational issues, and create a shared vision for a cohesive international education system in Washington State.
3. Advocacy: We will leave the September conference with an advocacy plan to ensure that the development of a cohesive international education system is a critical policy issue for the state of Washington.

Together we can build a statewide movement to support international education and ensure that our students are prepared to be future global citizens and enhance our collective impact on global development.

To learn more, contact Bookda Gheisar.

Back to Top

Featured Organization: China Tomorrow Education Foundation: A Better Future for Rural China

“As the smile of a poor little girl living in remote village in China with her cancer afflicted mom and the happiness of the children left behind in the countryside by their migrant parents flash into my mind, I realize how important the gift of education is in bringing about substantive change in people’s lives,” says Dennis Su, the President of China Tomorrow Education Foundation (CTEF).

CTEF believes in giving this gift of education and changing lives; so far the organization has impacted the lives of more than 51,000 children. They fulfill this exemplary mission with the support of their dedicated volunteers and donors. “Donate your time and energy and help kids in rural China” is the underlying theme of all their projects.

There is a wide education gap between the impoverished countryside and the booming cities of China. In rural China, many people with their meager incomes can’t afford to send their children to school. The prospect of earning money forces parents to migrate to cities and leave their children in the home village or towns. Usually these “left-behind children” end up living with their grandparents, who take care of the children’s personal safety and daily living but are unable to address their educational needs. There are inadequate educational amenities in the rural areas and children typically study in stone or brick houses, which have been converted into schools. The schoolteachers in the countryside tend to seek better-paying jobs in cities, which often takes the better teachers away from rural students.

CTEF was founded by a group of American Chinese to address this problem of inequality and unreasonable distribution of resources. Their resolve to help the children in rural China was also in sync with the acclaimed 1999 Chinese movie “Not One Less.” Beautifully filmed in a neorealist/documentary style, the movie showcased the difficulties in providing rural education in China. The movie was shown internationally and according to Dennis Su, served as an important tool for attracting the attention of the people towards the issue and fundraising in the initial days.

Since 1999, the China Tomorrow Education Foundation is on a mission to improve education in rural China and prepare the children to become responsible global citizens by renovating schools, establishing libraries, providing teaching equipment, training teachers, funding scholarships, and promoting public awareness of the education conditions in rural China. They work towards this mission through their 100% volunteer and donor-based programs.

CTEF provides financial assistance and moral support to poor students. Their 1+1 student sponsorship program, focusing on high school and college students, provides micro grants to deserving students for up to 50% of their subsistence and school admission costs. To sponsor a student, you only need to donate $150 per student per year for high/middle school students and around $400 per student per year for college students.

CTEF aims to give a more personal touch to its volunteer and donor programs. All volunteers are committed to donating their time and resources and covering their own administrative cost. This ensures that 100% of your donation will reach the students.

The 1+1 sponsorship program allows donors to select a student a list on the 1+1 sponsorship discussion board. The sponsorship discussion board includes information about the students, which enables the donor to make a judicious selection of the student to be sponsored. Once the student is selected from the list, CTEF sends the money to the student and facilitates direct communication with the student sponsored. Donors can personally talk to the student and keep track of his or her progress in school and life. Thus, CTEF helps donors establish personal relationships with the recipients of their donations and directs the money and care towards helping poor children improve their lives.

CTEF has laid down certain criteria for the students listed for sponsorship, which ensures that your time, energy, and money go to those who are bereft of all essential educational aids and resources and are truly deserving. The candidates are mainly selected by CTEF local volunteers, for example, teachers from rural schools. The students then fill out the 1+1 program application form. The information is validated by CTEF volunteers and finally posted on the 1+1 forum.

CTEF also recognizes the fact that access to education includes making significant changes in physical infrastructure and ensuring an adequate supply of needed materials to the children. With the help of a network of trustworthy volunteers, CTEF runs a school renovation program in rural China. The volunteers send first-hand school information and a building proposal. The proposal is evaluated by CTEF and if it’s well-planned for a limited budget and meets the criteria, CTEF goes ahead with the renovation. CTEF has funded 152 of school projects in 13 provinces, worth over $1.4 million (USD).

One of CTEF’s ongoing projects is ShangGang elementary school in GuangXi Province in China. The existing lecture building of this school is not safe for the students in the event of a natural disaster. Due to insufficient funding to construct new building, the children have no other choice but to study inside the old building. Any amount you donate to CTEF goes towards the construction of a safer school building.

CTEF has done commendable work when it comes to areas affected by earthquakes. A few of its earthquakes projects were in Sichuan and Gangsu, the most recent being the Yushu Earthquake Relief Fund. Any amount you donate to this project is used to rebuild schools, school libraries, and student scholarships and contribute towards educational advancement of the school children in earthquake-ravaged areas.

CTEF also gives donors the option to support the sponsorship program in general, simply by donating via the CTEF donor tool. The amount donated is pooled in with other donors to help the students in the program. Thus, you can contribute $1 to a fund for books in the school library, $15 to $20 to supply desks and chairs, $2,500 to $ 3000 for a standard classroom, and $6000-$10,000 to build a single-room rural school. If the donation is $6000 or more, the school is named after a group or individual donors.

CTEF’s success in carrying out volunteer and donor-based projects in rural China can be largely attributed to the support it gets from local communities and corporations in Seattle. Microsoft is one of its biggest corporate allies. Through donations of cash, software and volunteer work, Microsoft helps CTEF achieve its mission. It provides software that improves service delivery and reach, websites and databases to personalize interaction, and communication and collaboration tools to improve coordination and delivery. Receiving software from Microsoft allows CTEF to work more efficiently and keep their operations running smoothly and securely.

In addition to Microsoft, CTEF receives help from employees at Amazon, ARM, Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Google, Honeywell, Merrill Lynch and other companies.

CTEF also works in alignment with sister organizations like OCEF (Overseas China Education Foundation), Sowers Action, Interglow and The Zigen Fund.

As one of the member organizations of Global Washington, CTEF looks for new opportunities for growth and collaboration with diverse groups and people working in global development. Through Global Washington, CTEF gets a platform to connect, share, and strategize with diverse entities and direct their energy and resources towards promoting child education. We encourage you to contribute your time and energy and help CTEF in this noble cause. Donations to CTEF help bring about meaningful change in innocent children’s lives and leave a row of smiling faces.

To know more about how you can make a difference, please visit http://www.ctef.org/Involve/donate.aspx

Back to Top

Changemaker: Interview with Allan Paulson, President of Pangea

Impassioned by social justice and equity, Allan Paulson, a former consultant in leadership and development, decided to retire from his consulting career to engage on a path of global development work.  In 2003, Allan became President and founder of Pangea, a “hands-on” organization that raises money for grass roots organizations located in Asia, Central America and Africa. Pangea brings donors together, provides educational trainings and on-site visits to funded projects, and makes small grants to support the goals of small communities. Allan’s decision to participate in global development was crystallized after September 11th, when he and others imagined a better way to do philanthropy to create greater change in undeveloped communities all over the world.  “Communities lack financial and knowledge resources. We want to encourage people, to give them a boost and to help them accomplish their own goals,” said Allan. “This is not about us, donors, feeling good; this is about people improving their lives…Relationship with grantees and trust are in the earth of the grant process. We are a learning community. We want to be helpful in the ways they need us to be helpful.”

When I asked Allan about his greatest achievement, he mentioned the name “Raphael Okumu,” one of Pangea’s grantees, and now one of Allan’s good friends.  When they met, Raphael was 27, and had received a grant from PATH to learn how to use “social drama” to educate people in the street to prevent HIV/AIDS. Raphael was from Kenya and had a great idea for empowering youth in his country through the arts. Allan has been mentoring him ever since, and Pangea funds a part of his project.  Raphael has now created an arts academy. With admiration, Allan describes Raphael’s tremendous vision and “his spiritual commitment to support the development of youth of his country.”  Mentoring Raphael taught Allan about the importance of the arts in engaging youth. He has also realized just how critical the issues that youth currently face are (unemployment, unequal access to education).  For Allan, the work is much more that being a donor or a coach; it is about building relationships and knowledge. “We want to learn from others; we want to learn how to become better partners.”

Pangea values knowledge as an essential resource for community development. Pangea is unique in the sense that it promotes education for both donors and grantees. Based on its members’ interests, Pangea organizes educational workshops about various global development issues. The goal of these workshops is to increase donors’ awareness on specific topics (e.g. strengthening the role of women as agents of change, evaluation).  Similarly, during on-site visits of funded projects, Pangea works collaboratively with grantees to design leadership trainings or other workshops, according to the needs of communities and NGOs’ they partner with.

More than eight years have passed since Allan started to volunteer for Pangea. For him, everything happened “smoothly” and it has been a “wonderful experience” so far.   One reason for this success is that despite the diversity of members’ interests, all try to maintain a culture that promotes consensus. Fulfilling Pangea’s mission and maintaining an efficient “process” (promoting education, philanthropy, equity and strong relationship with grantees) is paramount.  As the organization is growing, challenges are mounting. Allan mentioned some of them: implementing a realistic evaluation program according to each community’s political, social, environmental context; incorporating new members into the learning process; and building stronger relationship with the grant partners though “liaisons.” Allan mentioned the need for maintaining and increasing each member’s cultural competency: “we want to respect our grantees’ culture; we want to learn how to support them.”

Pangea’s openness attracts an increasing number of members, now counting 45 individuals and couples. Allan found a supportive community in Washington State. Since 2003, members have partnered with 39 grassroots organizations in 9 countries and awarded grants totaling $477,603. Despite this success, it was with a lot of humility that Allan described his work.  For Allan, reinforcing relationships between staff and grantees, keeping learning about communities’ needs and improving the grant process is what matters the most.

Back to Top

Announcements

Global Washington Membership Survey

We are working to improve our programs and add more value to your membership. If you work for one of our member organizations, we want to hear from you! You should have received a link to our member survey in your email, and we encourage you to take 5 minutes of your time to complete it. If you didn’t receive the link, email admin@globalwa.org and we will send it to you. Thank you for supporting Global Washington!

Global Washington Directory

We have recently completed a review and restructuring of Global Washington’s online directory database. Following this work we are renewing our invitation to the Global Development community to be listed in our directory. This service is free and is open to anyone with a presence in the state of Washington that is working actively in the global development sector. A big thank you to everyone who has already added or updated their listing! To view our directory please visit: https://globalwa.org/resources/directory/advanced-search/. To add or update your listing, go to https://globalwa.org/resources/directory/add-listing/. For problems or questions, email admin@globalwa.org.

Communications Workshop

Do you ever feel that your organization could be more efficient in communicating to your constituents? Do you ever suspect that not everyone in your organization is clear about marketing objectives and priorities? Do you ever wonder about the long term impact of your organization’s communication efforts and contemplate if there are missed opportunities?

If your answer to any of these questions is “yes”, then your organization might benefit from the development of a strategic and integrated communication plan.

Global Washington is offering a three-hour communications training session with Claudia Ender, who will guide you through the different components of communication planning, and will give you an opportunity to start your own plan with hands-on exercises. At the end of the training, you will have developed a first draft for your organization, and you will be confident about finalizing it with your respective stakeholders. You will learn how to define your audience, set goals, and decide on the most effective marketing mix (PR, advertising, social media, direct marketing, events, etc.) depending on your organization’s business objectives.

The session will be on April 13th and registration will open on the Global Washington website on Tuesday, February 22nd. You’ll be receiving an invitation with more details next week!

News from RESULTS

World TB Day: RESULTS encourages you to plan on outreach event on March 24^th–World TB Day. To help you, there are resources available here. RESULTS has TB experts and patient-advocates available for your local events (community forums, university panels, rallies, TB walks, media events, or congressional meetings). Contact RESULTS Outreach and Advocacy Associate Crickett Nicovich if you have an upcoming event where you can utilize the skills of these experts. There are also mini-grants available: apply for one, or find out more!

Face-to-Face Meetings: RESULTS wants to see 70 face-to-face meetings with legislators by the end of March. Congressional recesses are happening February 21 – 25 and March 21-25. For tips on how to schedule a meeting and build your agenda,  see “Meet Face-to-Face with Your Member of Congress” or contact Ken Patterson, Global Grassroots Manager, or Lisa Marchal, Global Grassroots Associate, for extra support.

NGO Roundtable with Congressman Adam Smith

Congressman Adam Smith is hosting an NGO Roundtable on Friday, February 25^th at the Kent Library’s Large meeting room (212 2^nd Ave N, Kent, WA 98032).  The invitation from Congressman Smith reads, “As a Member of Congress, I recognize the important role played by NGOs in global development. The Puget Sound region is home to a number of terrific organizations working tirelessly to improve access to health care and education, and improving the infrastructure and opportunities for economic development around the globe. I appreciate the opportunity to meet with these groups and others interested in international affairs for a roundtable discussion to share insights and opinions, and discuss the important issues moving forward.”

RSVP to Matt Perry at (253) 593-6603 or by e-mail at matt.perry@mail.house.gov

InterAction’s 2011 Foreign Assistance Briefing Book is Now Available

InterAction has just announced the release of its second biennial Foreign Assistance Briefing Book (FABB). The book covers 16 critical topics, from climate change to agricultural development and health, as well as countries deemed important to U.S. national interests, including Afghanistan. The 2011 FABB presents the unified voice of the U.S. NGO community on foreign policy issues expected to draw attention in the 112th Congress. Browse the comprehensive FABB online by visiting InterAction’s FABB webpage.

InterAction member organizations worked together to develop succinct yet informative policy papers, compiled by the best thinkers in the community, drawing from expertise and lessons learned from working in the developing world. All of the policy papers include recommendations for U.S. policymakers that we believe will help to shape a more just and stable world while also improving the effectiveness of U.S. foreign assistance.

Landesa (formerly Rural Development Institute)

Momentum is a word we use frequently at Landesa – our recent growth is a big part of that, but more important is the growing awareness within the international development community about the key importance of land rights for sustained advancements on behalf of the world’s poor. We think there’s never been a more important time to elevate the cause of land and property ownership.

In the midst of this momentum, we have all kinds of changes to celebrate. Our new name links the ideals of “land” and “destiny,” and will serve us better as we use our voice to champion land rights with our development colleagues. We’re also growing in numbers. Our staff has more than doubled in the past year as we scale to accommodate increased capacity.

This growth has led to expanded program impact. Working closely with government partners, Landesa helped extend legal access to land to more than 2.4 million impoverished families in 2010 alone.

By 2014, our goal is to help 20 million rural families – from India, China, and six countries in sub-Saharan Africa – to receive secured rights to plots of land where they can live and work. You can learn more about how millions of families received legal control over their land last year in our 2010 Impact Report.

We’ll celebrate these milestones and call attention to our work aimed at advancing women’s land rights at our 5^th Annual International Women’s Day Luncheon: Seed the Change. We hope to see many Global Washington friends join us on March 15^th.

Landesa (then called Rural Development Institute) was founded in Seattle four decades ago by University of Washington emeritus professor of law, Roy Prosterman. The approach he designed – to partner with governments to facilitate land rights for the poor – remains the cornerstone of our mission, and will continue to guide us in the decades to come.

Visit our new website at Landesa.org to learn more, and we encourage you to join us on Facebook and Twitter for timely and useful resources on land rights and global development in general.

Our headquarters in Seattle also has a new office address:

1424 4th Avenue, Suite 300, Seattle WA 98101

Back to Top

Global Washington Events:

Wednesday, February 23

GW EVENT: Getting Started with Social Media: An Introductory Course

Back to Top

Other Events:

Thursday, February 17

Symposium on Humanitarian Assistance – Cindy Nofzinger, Schools for Salone

Doctors Without Borders: Recruitment Information Session

Wednesday, February 23

Community Coffee with PATH

Symposium on Humanitarian Assistance – Chris Megargee, Global Partnerships

Symposium on Humanitarian Assistance – Bolivia Smiles Forever (open to dental professionals and dental hygiene students)

Symposium on Humanitarian Assistance – Diana Fletschner, Landesa (Rural Development Institute)

Thursday, February 24

Symposium on Humanitarian Assistance – Student-led NGOs

Monday, February 28

Journeys of Hope: A Virtual PartnerTrip

World Affairs Council hosts Tim Johnson author of “Tragedy in Crimson: How the Dalai Lama Conquered the World but Lost the Battle with China”

Thursday, March 3

World Affairs Council presents The Wrong War: Grit, Strategy, and the Way Out of Afghanistan

Sunday, March 6

Muslims for Loyalty Conference

Monday, March 7

Educating a Nation: Women and Girls in the Democratic Republic of Congo

UW Foster School of Business Global Business Forum – Haddis Tadesse, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Tuesday, March 8

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL REVITALIZATION/DEVELOPMENT

2011 Celebration for the Health and Dignity of Women

Thursday, March 10

Thrive! with our zoo

Friday, March 11

Kathryn Robertson Memorial Lecture in Global Health “The Health of Our World”, Dr. Anne-Marie Slaughter

Saturday, March 12

2011 Steps to Healing Dinner Auction Gala

Monday, March 14

Global Health Metrics and Evaluation Conference

Tuesday, March 15

Global Health Metrics and Evaluation Conference

Wednesday, March 16

Global Health Metrics and Evaluation Conference

Tuesday, March 22

Habitat for Humanity – Building Houses, Building Hope Breakfast

Global Partnerships Open House

Wednesday, March 23

Faces of Hope with Friends of the Orphans

Sunday, March 27

Faces of Hope with Friends of the Orphans

Tuesday, March 29

Faces of Hope with Friends of the Orphans

Back to Top

Last week, at a foreign policy meeting of U.S. ambassadors from all over the world, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reemphasized the importance of civilian power, especially in light of the recent unrest in Egypt and Tunisia. Clinton and the current administration have made diplomacy and development and integral part of their strategy on national defense, as outlined in the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), which was released at the end of 2010.

At last week’s gathering, representatives from 260 U.S. posts abroad were brought to Washington, D.C., for a policy discussion in which Clinton emphasized again the importance of civilian power. The political climate in a country can change rapidly, requiring an even greater need for quality U.S. representation abroad. “Diplomats,” stressed Clinton,” are the on the front lines of America’s engagement with the world.” She also encouraged them to represent the U.S. in the digital world, engaging with current social media trends to stay up-to-date on what is being said and to respond effectively.

Clinton called this “a critical time for America’s global leadership,” and stressed again the importance of diplomacy and development alongside of defense as the primary components of national security and foreign policy. “We have spent two years renewing our alliances, forging new partnerships and elevating diplomacy and development,” she said. “ Now as we look to the next two years, it is time to build on that progress and deliver results.”

For more information on Clinton’s remarks and the gathering, see:

Hillary Clinton to diplomats: Respect ‘civilian power’

Hillary Clinton calls historic meeting of U.S. Ambassadors

Clinton: Critical Time for American Leadership

Clinton: American Diplomacy Must Be Accountable

The White House and the House Appropriations Committee have both released important budget documents in the last few days: the President released the 2012 Budget Request, and the House Appropriations Committee released the 2011 CR (Continuing Resolution).  These two documents highlight major differences between the budget plans from the GOP-controlled House and the administration.

Most of the foreign aid spending in the budget comes under the heading Department of State and Other International Programs.  This heading includes funding for USAID, the MCC, the Peace Corps, and other development initiatives in addition to funding directly controlled by the Department of State. 

The President’s 2012 Budget Request for the Department of State and Other International Programs

In the 2012 Budget Request, the President proposes a 1 percent increase from enacted 2010 funding levels in this heading, which is also a 1 percent decrease from the 2011 request.  You can find a fact sheet for the Department of State and Other International Programs on the OMB website here.  The President’s budget focuses on making investments in key areas, such as $1.4 billion to address the root causes of hunger and poverty, reducing malnutrition for millions of children under five years old by 2015 (one of the Millennium Development Goals).  It also makes cuts to certain programs and invests in reducing inefficiencies over time- the budget proposes eliminating foreign assistance to several countries, and changing USAID’s operating model to encourage local ownership, which would result in savings and more effective programs over time.  The budget request also reduces bilateral programs to Europe and Central Asia to focus on regions with greater needs such as in Africa, while cutting funding for the African Development Foundation and the Inter-American Foundation.

The House Appropriations Committee 2011 Continuing Resolution

By contrast, the House Committee on Appropriations introduced a CR (Continuing Resolution) with the “largest spending cuts in history” for the last 7 months of the 2011 fiscal year.  The CR makes large cuts to programs across the board, and the budget for foreign aid is not spared.  Here is the section on State and Foreign Operations from the Committee’s summary of the CR:

The State and Foreign Operations section of the CR contains a total of $44.9 billion in funding, which is $3.8 billion, or 8 percent, below last year’s level and $11.7 billion, or 21 percent, below the President’s fiscal year 2011 request.

In order to provide necessary and critical funding increases of $2.5 billion for national security priorities, including a total of $3 billion of military assistance to Israel and a total of $1 billion for the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund, the legislation actually cuts a total of $6.3 billion in other programs bill-wide. The bill reduces almost all State and Foreign Operations Accounts, except for specific security assistance accounts. The bill reduces programs that have grown substantially since fiscal year 2008, scales back contributions to the United Nations and other international organizations and banks, and eliminates wasteful, duplicative and ineffective programs. Additional operational cuts are taken, which will force agencies to take substantial cost-cutting measures.

The CR supports civilian operations in frontline countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan and continues the fiscal year 2010 level of economic assistance to Egypt with the understanding that Egypt will undertake significant economic and democratic reforms. The bill also maintains long-standing pro-life provisions and includes new prohibitions on international family planning.

Compared to the President’s FY11 Budget Request, the 2011 CR would include cuts to the following foreign aid accounts: USAID operating expenses by $205 million; Global Health and Child Survival by $1.5 billion; Development Assistance by $1.2 billion; International Disaster Assistance by $431 million; Peace Corps by $115 million; Millennium Challenge Corporation by $490 million; and Food for Peace by $544 million.

If enacted, these spending cuts would have a huge impact on U.S. foreign assistance around the world, affecting millions of lives.  And the Department of State and USAID only account for about 1% of the total federal budget- so the overall cost savings are meager, while putting lives at risk.  See MFAN’s statement about the foreign aid budget here, written by MFAN co-chairs David Beckmann, George Ingram, and Jim Kolbe.

What Next?  The Budget Process

While the CR represents a very strong statement about the foreign aid budget from the House, it is by no means a done deal.  There are still many steps to this bill’s passage.

A CR, or continuing resolution, is a bill that continues funding for the federal government for a set period of time in the event that regular appropriations bills aren’t passed by Congress in time for the fiscal year.  This happens in Congress almost every year- sometimes appropriations bills are passed for some parts of the budget, and all the other parts get rolled into an omnibus CR.  We are currently in the 2011 Fiscal Year, which began in October 2010 and ends September 30, 2011.  There have already been 4 CRs this year, which will cover the federal budget through 3/4/11.  You can find a chart on the status of appropriations bills for FY 2011, including all CRs, here.

The latest CR, HR 1, was introduced by the House Appropriations Committee on Friday.  In order for it to pass, it will need to be passed by both the House Appropriations and the Budget Committee, and then the full floor of the House.  The Senate Appropriations Committee and the floor of the Senate will also need to pass this bill, and in the process they may make modifications to it.  After it has passed both the House and the Senate floors the bill will move into Conference, where members of the House and Senate will work together on a compromise between the two versions, which will then go back to the House and Senate floors for a vote.  After all this, the President must sign the bill in order for it to become law.
 

For a breakdown of the President’s budget request for international affairs and more information about the House proposal, see the USGLC analysis here.

While the U.S. Agency for International Development is facing rising opposition in Congress, and the legislative reform process has virtually come to a halt, the agency responsible for implementing foreign assistance is proceeding with internal reforms. In a speech on January 19^th, Administrator Raj Shah announced a new monitoring and evaluation policy for USAID’s projects abroad. Committed to accountability to stakeholders and learning from past experiences to implement more effective strategies in the future, the new policy will do much to strengthen USAID.

As a part of USAID’s new reform agenda, USAID FORWARD, the new evaluation policy is critical to the knowledge of the agency and the efficacy of the projects. As Administrator Shah acknowledged in the preface to the policy, “this policy will make us better able to identify areas where we are more capable of achieving development results, and those where we have less success and therefore need to improve.” Given that official evaluations submitted to USAID fell by two-thirds and program funding has tripled since 1994, this policy will play a crucial role in revitalizing USAID’s evaluation capacity.

Apart from a clearly delineated organizational structure and hierarchy, the new evaluation policy sets forth new evaluation and monitoring practices as well:

• -The initial design of projects will now take into consideration the evaluations that will ultimately review the efficacy of the project. An average of 3 percent of the project funds will also be made available for the evaluation.

• -In an effort to dispel biased measurement and reporting, evaluations will be conducted by an external entity with no stake in the implementation of the project. However, internal evaluations will still be conducted to contribute to institutional learning.
• -In an effort to support local ownership of development projects, local entities with no affiliation to the projects will be called upon to implement the reviews.
• -To increase transparency, USAID will publish the results and findings of each project’s evaluation for public consumption.
• -Each evaluation will be designed to include both qualitative and quantitative review processes.

As another step along the road to reform, this new evaluation policy helps to make USAID more transparent and accountable, while supporting local capacity at the same time. However, in order to make USAID as effective as possible, more reforms will be necessary.

There are times when the term “disabled” simply doesn’t apply. That’s definitely true for the cricket team sponsored by Clear Path International in Afghanistan’s Nangarhar Province. Although team members all possess some type of physical disability, their winning record against completely able-bodied opponents calls into question whether labeling them as the disabled cricket team is indeed appropriate.

The team was created by CPI’s partner, Afghan Disabled Vulnerable Society (ADVS) to provide sports activities for youth with physical challenges, and to change public perceptions about the role of disabled persons in the community. Most of the players live in Jalalabad City, the bustling epicenter of the province near the Pakistan border. They are landmine survivors, young men who have contracted polio, or who’ve suffered in other ways from violence or disease related to war and the lack of medical care.

And yet they excel at competitive cricket. These men have played together for more than two years, having won several matches against teams without a single disabled player. Recently, they won the overall trophy in a five-team tournament in Jalalabad. Over three days, they defeated each of the opposing teams, none of which had disabled members.

Through its expert coaches, ADVS trains young men for physically challenging sports, teaches them cooperative and team-focused skills and shores up their self-esteem. ADVS is one of several Afghan organizations that partner with Clear Path to assist persons with disabilities, including survivors of landmine and cluster munition accidents.

CPI’s Afghan program, funded by the Department of State’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement, has already helped more than 16,000 people with disabilities in the war-torn nation. CPI also assists victims of war in Vietnam, Cambodia, along the Thai-Burma border and in Lao PDR.

Clear Path International assists landmine survivors and other victims of war in Afghanistan and Southeast Asia, and is a member of Global Washington.

Afghan Disabled Cricket Team Proves Ability
Karen Matthee | Clear Path International | February 8

“Today, it is not surprising and is rather, somewhat expected, that CEOs devote a portion of their time in Davos to articulating what their companies are doing to advance the global development agenda. And that increasingly there is an inextricable link between that agenda and the prosperity of their own enterprises” writes Joe Cerrell, director of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s European Office.

In a recent Reuters blog post called “Global Development crashes the Davos party,” Cerrell discusses the increasing presence of a global development agenda at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Cerrell briefly traces the history of this trend in Davos over the last 10 years starting when Bill Gates launched the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in 2000. While the forum has perhaps moved away from the years when celebrities like Bono, Sharon Stone, and Angelina Jolie could steal the Davos spotlight to push forward development issues, Cerrell thinks that these years have brought about a lasting shift; global development is now accepted as a normal part of the WEF’s conversation on business and economics.

Cerrell hopes to see global development “crashing” more and more gatherings to which it was previously uninvited. At Global Washington, we share his desire to explore these issues in diverse sectors. Our membership consists of nonprofits, foundations, businesses, and academic institutions in the state of Washington, all united in common goal of making the world a more equitable and prosperous place. As this kind of dialogue continues in prominent venues, we hope to also see innovative and mutually beneficial partnerships formed to address important needs in health, education, environmental sustainability, poverty alleviation and other global issues

On January 24th, Michelle Bachelet announced a 100-day action plan for U.N. Women, a newly-formed agency for promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women around the globe. “Women’s strength, women’s industry, women’s wisdom are humankind’s greatest untapped resource,” said Bachelet, a former president of Chile and executive director of the fledgling agency.

Bachelet laid out five priorities for U.N. Women: enhancing women’s leadership and participation; ending violence against women; supporting women’s role in peace and conflict resolution; bolstering economic opportunities for women; and placing gender equality high on the agenda of national, local and sectoral planning and budgeting. She also discussed five core principles for the agency: enhancing implementation of international accords by national partners; backing intergovernmental processes to strengthen the global framework on gender equality; advocating gender equality and women’s empowerment; promoting coherence with the UN on the issue; and acting as a global broker of knowledge and experience.

U.N. Women—which is officially called the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women—was established by the general assembly last year, merging four former U.N. entities into one. The main functions of the agency are to support inter-governmental bodies in their formulation of policies and standards as they relate to women; to assist U.N. members in the implementation of those standards through technical and financial support as needed and by creating effective partnerships; and to provide accountability to the U.N. for its own commitments relating to gender equality.

Bachelet’s remarks came during the inaugural session for the agency’s executive board. U.N. Women’s formal launch will be February 24th, 2011.

For more information on U.N. Women and the 100-day action plan, please visit:

• http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=37364&Cr=women&Cr1
• http://www.devex.com/en/blogs/the-development-newswire/un-women-chief-maps-out-100-day-action-plan?g=1
• http://www.unwomen.org/