A provocative debate over Bill Easterly’s critique of The Gates Foundation’s questionable data reporting continues to incite controversy. Easterly’s assertion that the Gates Foundation cherry-picked data to validate the success of their malaria treatment and prevention programs has been met with mixed criticism. David Roodman’s post for the Center of Global Development challenges Easterly’s own vigilance in subjecting those who share his views with the same scrutiny as his adversaries. How does an organization’s need to show programmatic success in order to gather donor support compromise standards and best practices in data collection and analysis? Furthermore, are we biased toward judging those who agree with us less harshly, even in the name of scientific research? Let us know what you think! Read More
Subscribe to our blog by email.
Our blog is open to all of Global Washington’s members to contribute. We value a diversity of opinions on a broad range of subjects of interest to the global health and development community.
Blog article submissions should be around 800-900 words. Photos, graphs, videos and other art that supports the main themes are strongly encouraged.
You may not be the best writer, and that’s okay. We can help you shape and edit your contribution. The most important thing is that it furthers an important conversation in your field, and that it is relatively jargon-free. Anyone without a background in global development should still be able to engage with your ideas.
If you include statistics or reference current research, please hyperlink your sources in the text, wherever possible.
Have an idea of what you’d like to write about? Let’s continue the conversation! Email comms@globalWA.org and put “Blog Idea” in the subject line.
by Global Washington Policy Coordinator Danielle Ellingston
The Center for Global Development released its 2009 Commitment to Development Index (CDI), and unsurprisingly, the United States ranked 17th out of 22, just below Portugal and above Greece. The CDI rates rich countries on how much they help poor countries build prosperity, good government, and security. Each rich country gets scores in seven policy areas, which are averaged for an overall score.
The United States scored worst in the aid and environment policy areas, where it ranked 18th and 20th respectively. In aid, the CGD found weaknesses in low aid volume, high tied aid, and poor targeting of aid to where it is needed most. The environment policy weaknesses were high greenhouse gas emissions per capita, low gas tax, and not ratifying the Kyoto Protocol. The U.S. got some bonus points in aid for high private charitable giving- and we know that Washington State organizations had a lot to do with that.
The U.S. did well in the area of trade, where it ranked 3rd, behind Australia and New Zealand. Our (relatively) low agricultural tariffs and subsidies were cited as our strength in trade policy. Now if only we could get somewhere on providing duty-free and quota-free access to all poor countries, we’d be #1 in trade.
There is hope for the United States in 2010- or maybe 2011, at the rate we’re going. Obama announced a Presidential Study Directive () and a Quadrennial Review on Development and Diplomacy, and there is a lot of talk about reforming the Foreign Assistance Act, which isn’t so much a policy as a hodge-podge Read More
event re-cap by Global WA volunteer Saira Abbasey McDonald
El Centro de la Raza – Seattle, WA
October 21, 2009
· Valerie Nkamgang Bemo, MD, MPH – Senior Program Officer at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
· Carol Schillios – Founder and President of the Fabric of Life Foundation
Originally from Cameroon, Dr. Valerie Nkamgang Bemo worked with several field-based health non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Africa before joining the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. She is now engaged in work related to emergency medical response related to natural disasters like cyclones and flooding, food crises, and diseases like meningitis.
Dr. Bemo detailed some of the critical issues that affect development progress in West African countries today, including:
· Conflict. Though there is officially peace in most of the region, pockets of armed conflict remain in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Cote D’Ivoire.
· Population movement: Conflict often gives rise to population movement. Displaced people face a host of threats to their health and security, as well as issues of integration in their new environment.
· Climate change: Climate change has had great impact on the populations living near the Sahel, the arid band of land that stretches the continent. Inconsistent rainfall has had significant economic impact on farmers and others who depend on the rains.
· Health: In the last ten years, West Africans have made significant progress in health. Dr. Bemo noted several remaining issues, including:
o Maternal and child health: Many women are dying preventable deaths in childbirth, and child mortality rates remain very high.
o Malaria claims many lives—especially those of children—due to the high cost of treatment
o Meningitis outbreaks occur frequently due to the increasingly dry climate
Despite these troubles, Dr. Bemo noted that West Africa has great economic potential and an Read More