We Need You to Act Now for a Robust FY11 International Affairs Budget

Take-Action-Button-v21Nearly 140 members of Congress have signed on to the FY11 Congressional Letter to the President supporting a robust International Affairs budget. From Washington State, Senator Patty Murray, as well as Representatives Adam Smith, David Reichert, Richard Larsen, and Jim McDermott have signed on. The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition needs your help to get more members of the Washington State delegation signed on to this important letter! The deadline is November 25th– only two days away.

Click here to urge your members of Congress to sign the letter.

UPDATE:  Thank you for taking action- the USGLC reports that a record number of legislators have signed on to this letter demanding a robust FY 11 international affairs budget.  Representatives Jay Inslee and Brian Baird of Washington State added their names to the letter after this post was published.  For a full list of the signatories to the letter, see the FY 11 Congressional Letter to the President Update Center on the USGLC website.

November 2009 Newsletter

Welcome to the November 2009 issue of the Global Washington newsletter. If you would like to contact us directly, please email us.

 

IN THIS ISSUE

Note from our Executive Director

Bookda1Greetings-

It’s been a busy time at Global Washington as we gear up for our annual conference in December.  With all of the recent successes and achievements in Washington State’s development community, collaboration among organizations to create a unified voice is more important than ever. That’s why Global Washington is interested in hearing from you: What do you need to build your organization’s capacity in Washington State?

We encourage you to contribute your innovative thoughts and ideas on how to move Washington State forward as a powerful collective of organizations working in the global development community. Please visit BlueprintForAction.Org to share your vision as part of our Blueprint for Action. Vote on those ideas and priorities you feel are most vital for building capacity among global development organizations in Washington State.

As we prepare for our conference, Global Washington is thrilled to bring such a vibrant community of inspiring and dynamic individuals and organizations together. We look forward to seeing you at the conference!In unity,
Bookda Gheisar, Executive Director

top

Spotlight: Global Washington Releases Global Development Sector Profile

berkGlobal Washington, in partnership with Berk & Associates (a public policy consulting firm),contacted 763 businesses, academic centers, nonprofits and foundations in March and April 2009, inviting them to complete a survey of their global development activities. Of an estimated 763 organizations, a sampling of 122 met our definition of global development work based on their survey responses, including their reported activities in the developing world and the kind of issues they reported addressing.

The results have been developed into a Global Development Sector Profile for the state of Washington to demonstrate just how vital global development is to Washington’s future. This profile describes the impact of Washington’s global development sector both at home in Washington and around the world, and highlights the unique strengths and accomplishments of our region.

“Rooted in extraordinary vision and leadership. Washington’s global development sector is becoming an international force. Academic, business, philanthropic and nonprofit leaders from across the state are making crucial contributions to global health, poverty alleviation, the environment and education.” Click here to view the entire document as a PDF.

top

Featured Organization: The Wang Center for Global Education at Pacific Lutheran University.

Wanglutes-kelsey beaman-Lunch Time StoriesThe Wang Center for Global Education at Pacific Lutheran University has achieved a record in international global education that no other institution shares.  In 2006 it was the first university to have programs going simultaneously to all seven continents. According to Mary M. Dwyer, president of the Institute of the International Education of Students, simultaneous study on seven continents was “a first in the field of education abroad and puts PLU in the forefront of undergraduate education where education abroad is no longer a frill but rather central to a high quality college education.”  PLU will again have students studying on all seven continents in 2010.

PLU has placed among the top 10 master’s degree universities in the United States for percentage of students engaged in international study. Over 40 percent of PLU students study abroad. The national study abroad average is 3 percent.

These broad efforts are the result of three decades of faculty initiatives accepted by the University.  The big push came in 2003 when PLU adopted its strategic plan for PLU 2010 and beyond.  The plan adopted global education as an integral part of a university Wang china group 07education.  The two overarching goals of the program were to increase participation of the PLU community in global education and to enhance the quality of its global education programs.   To achieve the latter, the University is implementing a model of education it calls PLU’s Global Education Continuum which contains four developmental phases intended to nurture the ability to participate actively in learning and working environments in global contexts.  Ideally students are exposed to introductory information about global problems and issues, are given the chance to explore this information through an off-campus course summer or J-Term course, participate in another culture in a semester or year long course away, and then integrate their knowledge by bringing home what they have learned.

PLU’s goal is to have fifty percent of the students study abroad.  In a graduating class of 700, three or four hundred students will have spent at least four weeks away in intensive study.  The effort to totally integrate the global program into the life of the university has been integral to making PLU a globally-focused university. PLU uses the term ‘study away’ as it does not just limit global education to studying abroad. PLU offers several domestic programs, in addition to those offered abroad, believing that students can gain valuable cultural and global perspectives within their own state, and even their own community.

Why PLU?  How does a small college in Tacoma, Washington, make global education central to its mission to educate its students?  It starts with PLU’s background as a Lutheran college which inherited the international development approach of its Norwegian founders: Conflict Resolution and Democracy Building.  But Neal Sobania, Director of the Wang Center, freely admits that “the best ideas are stolen.” That works both ways.  While PLU has borrowed ideas from other schools in the past, other schools now also borrow from PLU’s proven excellence.

wang1PLU calls its travelers abroad “Sojourners,” and makes available to them a wide variety of programs.  Gateway programs are semester-long study away programs that have been designed and developed by PLU and several key PLU faculty members.  One example is the Norway-Namibia Project where students study in Norway alongside Namibian and Norwegian students and learn of Norway’s approach to democracy, development, and peace in the world today.  Or students may spend a semester or year at Sichuan University (SU) in Chengdu, China, taking classes in Mandarin and Chinese culture, and other courses taught in English.

In addition to the Gateway programs, PLU students may participate in programs developed in conjunction with other universities and institutions, such as a program in Windhoek-Namibia offered through the Consortium for Global Education (CGE) in spring and fall semesters. This program focuses on nation building, globalization and decolonizing the mind from Southern African perspectives.

Finally there are J-Term programs led by PLU faculty that take place between the end of the fall semester and beginning of the spring semester.  These courses go under such course titles as “Journey to the End of the Earth: Antarctica, Patagonia, Buenos Aires,” and environmental literature offering from the English Department, or “Telling Their Story: Arts and news Media in the United Arab Emirates” in the Communications Department.

WAngNorway, Fall 2007In addition to assisting students and faculty with their study away goals, the Wang Center provides annual research grants to students and faculty alike, and sponsors International Symposia such as the one coming up in March titled “Understanding the World through Sports and Recreation.”

PLU received one million dollars from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in a challenge grant which PLU met resulting in a two million dollar endowment to provide  students on campus with funds to go abroad such as those who are on Pell grant support.

PLU also received the 2009 Senator Paul Simon Award for Campus Internationalization, a prestigious award honoring outstanding efforts on and off campus to engage the world and the international community. PLU is the first and only private college in the West to have received this honor.

This article doesn’t do justice to the wealth of global programs underway at PLU.  To see more check out the Center’s website at http://www.plu.edu/wang-center
top

Changemaker: Joe Orlando – A Gathering of Different Lights

J.Orlando bandwA chapel stands off to side of the Seattle University campus infused with light.  Depending upon where the visitor is in the chapel and the time of day, the light reflects the different colors of the painted baffles that hang in front of windows cut high in the chapel’s walls at the ceiling.  A more traditional source filters light directly into the chapel through rectangles of colored glass set back in the walls like shadow boxes.  The design, by architect Stephen Holl, is inspired by the way St. Ignatius of Loyola, the founder of the Jesuits, learned how to discern interior lights and darkness.

The light Joe Orlando shows the world has similar sources.  One major inspiration in his life reflects the countries and cultures he has visited and learned to love since that first trip abroad.  The more direct light is his own interpretation of the world through his education and work.  We all grow by both absorption and effort.

Joe Orlando is the Assistant Vice President of Mission and Ministry at Seattle University, and the Director of Jesuit Identity there.   He has a B.A. from Harvard College, a Master of Divinity from Weston Jesuit School of Theology, a Master of Social Work from the University of Washington, and a Doctorate in Educational Leadership from Seattle University. In charge of SU’s efforts to involve its students and faculty in mission-inspired outreach to local and international communities, Joe’s hands are full.

A junior year semester abroad in Florence to round out the Italian he was studying had a huge impact on his life.  He became interested in Latin America and returned home to apply his Italian to quickly learning Spanish.  After graduation and a month of service work in Mexico, he had the opportunity to go to Colombia as a translator for a medical team and then to the Central Valley in California where he taught job skills to economically disadvantaged teens. Then, working as the Assistant Director of the Jesuit International Volunteers, he traveled extensively around Central America, developing placements for volunteers.Joe&Isabel2

After completing graduate study in ministry at Weston School of Theology, now a part of Boston College, he came to Seattle University in 1990.  As a Campus Minister, he helped students learn how to use their gifts in service to others, helping them reach out to those in prison or at soup kitchens.  He put his knowledge of Central America to work, taking a dozen students to Belize over Spring Break to learn about other cultures and about being part of a global community.  That program lasted for four years, before he transferred his attention to Nicaragua where the community was much poorer and demanded more from the students.  There students spent Spring Break staying in homes of local families, working in community feeding programs and meeting at night after dinner to discuss what they learned during the day about the privileges they took for granted.

Changing his focus from students to faculty and staff on becoming the Director of Jesuit Identity, Joe helps his colleagues understand how they can put the Jesuit mission into action in their roles on campus as teachers and leaders.  To supplement programs such as retreats, speakers and discussion groups, Joe designed an annual nine day Nicaraguan immersion experience for 15 faculty and staff that emphasizes the Jesuit mission commitment to justice and global engagement.    In 2001 he took a diverse group of faculty and staff to Nicaragua where they both learned about the development needs of the country, and learned from their Jesuit university counterparts in Managua about how the Jesuit mission can inspire action (the Universidad Centroamericana, or UCA)   How, for example, does a law school do clinical work in Nicaragua?  How does a university respond to the need for microfinance among the rural poor?  This experience was so highly regarded by the faculty that in 2002, the President of Seattle University took his Executive Team along with some Deans and Trustees through a similar intensive nine day immersion program in Nicaragua, in close collaboration with peers at the UCA in Managua.  Since 2001 the Nicaragua Immersion Experience has brought 85 faculty, 43 staff and 6 trustees/spouses to Nicaragua on 9 separate trips.

Summer 2008 179Joe’s formulation of the Nicaragua Immersion Experience in support of the Jesuit educational mission has born fruit.  One SU biologist helped local farmers understand the genetic origins of freshwater shrimp through a Fulbright scholarship.  An SU chemist developed a kit that farmers can use to tell them when the fermentation of coffee beans is done.  SU’s chapter of Engineers without Borders redesigned an elementary school’s drainage system after the need was identified during a trip by the group’s faculty advisor to prevent flooding during the rainy season.  Nursing students have participated in a five week community health practicum there.  The Law School sends two students every summer to work on casework with their peers and to learn about legal issues around microfinance, such as land title problems.  Following up on a marketing plan proposed by a visitor from the Business School, and in cooperation with the microfinance efforts of the UCA, the SU bookstore has sold more than $125,000 of crafts made by local artisans who are microloan recipients.

But as is usually the case, these visits changed the visitors more than the visited.  Teachers learned the difference that passion brings Summer 2008 166to their lives and teaching.  Teaching about poverty means asking their students to actually speak to people who are poor.  The skills local women showed in organizing themselves become text book examples in the classroom.  The experience of engagement in Nicaragua has encouraged the University to become more daring in its engagement at home.  It is probably not a coincidence that the people who approved SU’s hosting of Tent City in 2005 had been on the Nicaragua trip in 2002.

The visits also lead a trustee to propose, and Seattle University to endorse, the investment of University funds in microfinance efforts in developing countries in coordination with Global Partnerships.  Joe’s goal, which he has presented to the Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities (composed of 28 US universities, and linked with more than 200 Jesuit institutions worldwide), is that 1% of all Jesuit university investments be placed in microfinance endeavors.

The programs Joe has developed for Seattle University students, faculty and staff helps them learn both to be present to the light of others, and to channel their own light in service to others in the world.top

Global Entertainment: Three Cups of Tea – One Man’s Mission to Fight Terrorism and Build Nations…One School at a Time

3CTCoverSmallThree Cups of Tea: One Man’s Mission to Fight Terrorism and Build Nations… One School at a Time, by Greg Mortenson and David Oliver Relin

Three Cups of Tea tells the inspirational story of mountain climber Greg Mortenson, who lost his way while descending K2 and found himself on a new journey to build schools in one of the world’s most remote, destitute, and volatile regions.

The story begins in 1993 when a lost and exhausted Mortenson stumbled into Korphe village, high up in the Karakoram mountains of Pakistan. While being nursed to health by the villagers, he was deeply touched by their kindness and generosity but disturbed to discover that the village children had no schoolhouse, pens, or paper with which to study. Mortenson swore he would return and build a school for Korphe. Not only did Mortenson fulfill this promise; he soon found himself building many more schools in the region.

The book describes Mortenson’s tremendous dedication, self-sacrifice, and bravery.  In the early days, he sold everything he owned to build the first school, wrote hundreds of fundraising letters on a typewriter (only to receive one small donation), worked long hours and slept in hallways to save money for the school. Even after he found a devoted sponsor and founded the Central Asia Institute, Mortenson allowed himself very little pay, and instead channeled every penny into building the schools. Over the years, Mortenson made dozens of trips into the remote regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan to scout and build these schools, refusing to be deterred by harsh and desolate geography, fatwas, kidnapping, death threats by fellow Americans, and war.

Besides being an inspirational read, Three Cups of Tea provides a much-needed window into the lives and circumstances of Pakistanis and Afghans in the years before and after September 11th. The book depicts most of the people he encountered as moderate Muslims, extremely poor but full of hope and optimism for the future of their children, fans of the United States, and extremely grateful to Mortenson for building the schools. Reading the book gives one a sense of an alternative future for US-Muslim relations  if not for Al Qaeda and September 11th.

As luck would have it, though, September 11th did happen, and Mortenson found himself and his work at the center of international conflict. The book provides an amazing account of Mortenson watching as Al Quaeda troops rolled through Pakistan and into Afghanistan by the truckful just prior to the attack on America, setting up tens of thousands of Wahhabi madrassa (fundamentalist schools that often serve as terrorist training camps).  Equally as interesting is Mortenson’s account of watching from the mountains of Pakistan as the September 11th attack and the war in Afghanistan unfolded.   He tells us that the villagers were angry and outraged by the attack on “the village of New York”, but they were also not at all surprised that the attack was waged by Osama Bin Laden, a bad egg they had been observing from their side of the Afghan border.

Refusing to leave even when foreigners were evacuated, Mortenson remained, vowing to continue building schools in Pakistan, and also to build them in Afghanistan.  During this time, the schools took on a new relevance for Mortenson and for the many Americans who now took up his cause. Whereas the project began as a simple effort to bring education to remote villages that otherwise lacked schools and educational resources for their children, the schools now became a bastion against rise of Islamic fundamentalism in the region.  They provide education to girls where Pakistani and Afghan schools would not; they offer a balanced and yet Islam-friendly alternative to the fundamentalist education taught in rapidly proliferating madrassas; they give impoverished villagers options for a brighter future; and they serve to root out ignorance that feeds the fires of terrorism in the region.

One major lesson of the book that I take away is this: creating a successful international development program is about 60 percent hard work and determination, and 40 percent luck.  By virtue of his tremendous will, self sacrifice, and relentless outreach, networking, and fundraising drive, Mortenson has been able to build the Central Asian Institute and some 130 schools since 1993. But much of this might never have happened if not for Mortenson’s chance introduction to the philanthropist Dr. Hoerni (indeed, even with his generous support, the Central Asian Institute struggled to keep financially afloat for several years). Nor would the Central Asia Institute have found such success if not for a turn of fate one sunny September morning in 2001, when US public attention shifted to this otherwise obscure region. With this crisis, Mortenson’s work became much more relevant to the American public and donations began pouring in, enabling him to expand operations both within Pakistan and into Afghanistan.

The one criticism I have of the book is that the first quarter spends too much time detailing Mortenson’s mountain climbing adventure. But don’t give up.  It is well worth the read.Review by Ketty Loeb, Wokai Seattle Founder

top

Announcements

  • EndofPovertykeyartPremiere of Compelling Film The End of Poverty? : The End of Poverty? is a daring, thought-provoking and very timely documentary by award-winning filmmaker, Philippe Diaz, revealing that poverty is not an accident. It began with military conquest, slavery and colonization that resulted in the seizure of land, minerals and forced labor. Today, global poverty has reached new levels because of unfair debt, trade and tax policies — in other words, wealthy countries exploiting the weaknesses of poor, developing countries.The End of Poverty? asks why today 20% of the planet’s population uses 80% of its resources and consumes 30% more than the planet can regenerate?The film has been selected to over 25 international film festivals and will be released in theatres in November 2009. Directed by Philippe Diaz, produced by Cinema Libre Studio with the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, 104mins, 2008, USA, documentary in English, Spanish, French with English Subtitles.Official Website: http://www.theendofpoverty.com
    Watch the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRZnEBFYNS0
    Sign up for The End of Poverty? mailing list to receive updates and exclusive giveaways! http://cinemalibrestudio.com/icontact_images/teop_sign_up.htmlIn Seattle starting December 4th at Regal Meridian 16, 1501 7th Ave Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 622-2434
  • PATH and Partners Awarded 5-year Contract and Funding for Congo HIV/AIDS Project: PATH and its project partners have been awarded a five-year contract to improve HIV/AIDS services in the Democratic Republic of Congo.  The PATH-led pathconsortium will receive up to $45 million in project funding from the US Agency for International Development (USAID). “This new project is a comprehensive and integrated response to the devastation caused by HIV/AIDS in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” said Julie Pulerwitz, ScD, director of the HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis Program at PATH. “It will not only improve prevention, care, and treatment services in the short term but also strengthen the long-term capacity of local communities and health systems to meet the nation’s overwhelming needs.” To read more about this project, click here.
  • Rural Development Institute Receives $9 million from Omidyar: Member organization R.D.I. has been awarded theRDI India_land title largest grant in its history — $9 million over three years — from the Omidyar Network. According to Tim Hanstad, RDI’s president and CEO, “With this grant, RDI will begin implementing an ambitious three-year plan to bring secure land rights to 9 million families living in poverty. These rights can bring about transformative economic and social benefits that improve well-being and restore dignity.” In addition to receiving the grant, RDI launched its Global Center for Women’s Land Rights, an initiative dedicated to procuring land ownership for women. Click here to learn more about Rural Development Institute.
  • Ashesi University and Patrick Awuah Win the 2009 John P. McNulty Prize: The jury, including Madeleine Albright and Bill Gates, Sr., awarded the prize for extraordinary leaders making creative, effective, and lasting contributions to their community earlier this month. It acknowledges the visionary leadership of Patrick Awuah in creating Ashesi University and its commitment to ethics and civics, which is guaranteeing future generations of leaders for Ghana, Africa and the world. Click here to read the Aspen Institute’s press release and to watch the new McNulty Prize video about Ashesi.

top

Upcoming Events

Click here to see a full list of international development events on the Global Washington’s calendar. Upcoming events include:

Please submit your events to our calendar!

top

contacted 763
businesses, academic centers, nonprofits
and foundations in March and April 2009,
inviting them to complete a survey of their
global development activities.
Of an estimated 763 organizations, a
sampling of 122 met our definition of
global development work based on their
survey responses, including their reported
activities in the developing world and the
kind of issues they reported addressing.

Kerry/Lugar Foreign Aid Reform Bill in Markup Today

by Global Washington Policy Coordinator Danielle Ellingston

kerry-lugarThe Senate Foreign Relations Committee is scheduled to mark up the Kerry/Lugar Foreign Aid Reform Bill, S. 1524 today, despite objections from the State Department.  According to Foreign Policy’s blog, the Cable, State Department leaders asked Senator Kerry to hold off on moving the bill forward, at least until they had a chance to finish the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR).  Kerry would have complied with this request, but Senator Lugar reportedly forced his hand- Lugar would withdraw his support for the bill if Kerry didn’t move it forward.  And understandably, Kerry could not afford to lose Lugar.

The State Department was asking a lot of Kerry, since the QDDR isn’t due to be completed until fall 2010.  That is a long time to wait for action on foreign aid reform by Congress, and a lot can happen in a year.  If Congress wants to have a say in this process, it needs to get its chips on the table now, especially with the administration taking so long with each step.  The White House has already shown us how slow it can be, by taking more time to announce a USAID administrator nominee than the polar ice caps need to melt.  If moving forward on this bill helps push the White House to move a little faster on foreign aid reform, so much the better.

S. 1524, the Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act of 2009, strengthens USAID by restoring its policy planning staff and giving it new authority to oversee foreign assistance programs throughout the government.  It is a small but necessary step in modernizing U.S. foreign assistance, which is fragmented and uncoordinated.  Maybe everything in this bill and more could be accomplished through the QDDR and the Presidential Study Directive, but without Congressional action that could take a very long time.

There are two other foreign aid reform bills which have been introduced in the House.  H.R. 2139, The Initiating Foreign Assistance Reform Act of 2009, was introduced by Howard Berman in April 2009, and directs the President to develop a comprehensive national strategy to promote global development, as well as a system for monitoring effectiveness.  H.R. 2639, The Global Poverty Act of 2009, introduced by Adam Smith of the 9th district of Washington State in May 2009, directs the President to develop a similar strategy, with the objective of eliminating extreme global poverty and achieving the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people living on less than $1 per day.   The NGO Bread for the World has a nice side-by-side comparison of S. 1524 and H.R. 2139 in its blog.

NGOs Live by the Code, Ideally

By Xeno Acharya, Global Washington intern

The use of a code of conduct as an ethical guide is not new. Previously popular with the military, the code has recently become fashionable among NGOs. Over the past decade, a lot of NGOs have formed and tried to adhere to various codes of conducts. They come in different flavors, these codes. They are either country specific (click here to see an example of code of conduct for NGOs working in Ethiopia) or project specific (click here to see an example of code of conduct for NGOs working in HIV/AIDS), or they are country level codes that empower recipient countries and prevent donor communities from monopolizing aid activities, such as the Paris Declaration (2005).

Recently, a few big players in the global health arena have partnered to produce yet another NGO code of conduct for health systems strengthening. These partners, including Health Alliance International, Partners In Health, Health GAP, and Action Aid International, have managed to add more than forty-five different NGOs as signatories for the code. The NGO code of conduct for health systems strengthening came about as a response to the recent growth in the number of international non-governmental organizations initiated by increased aid flow. Due to crowding of NGOs with similar niches, recipient country governments have a hard time managing all the programs, making effective project implementation virtually impossible, thus counteracting the purpose of aid in the first place.

The NGOs code of conduct for health systems strengthening has the following six articles:

I. NGOs will engage in hiring practices that ensure long-term health system sustainability.
II. NGOs will enact employee compensation practices that strengthen the public sector.
III. NGOs pledge to create and maintain human resources training and support systems that are good for the countries where they work.
IV. NGOs will minimize the NGO management burden for ministries.
V. NGOs will support Ministries of Health as they engage with communities.
VI. NGOs will advocate for policies that promote and support the public sector.

These types of codes offer practical ethical standards for NGOs and donors engaged in development work. These standards aim to improve the quality and impact of their work. All of this sounds well and good, but the question still remains—how much of this well intentioned code is having an effect and changing NGO behavior? A brief talk with one of the strongest advocates for the health systems code, Dr. Steve Gloyd of Health Alliance International, suggests that the code is not being adhered to even by signatories who were at first excited about it. “Most of the staff in the signatory NGOs don’t even know about the code”, said Dr. Gloyd when asked about its effectiveness. The signatories are voluntary participants of the code, acknowledging it as a guiding principle to real change. Some NGOs, however, face structural problems in implementation that the code fails to address.

What is missing from this effort to improve NGO functioning in low and middle income countries? What would the alternative look like? Although having a centralized, international monitor for NGO activities in recipient countries (such as a coalition of donor agencies, foundations, and big international NGOs) would be ideal, it would probably not be feasible because of the vast number of NGOs around the world. However, a network of the few biggest players in global health in collaboration with recipient country governments could not only manage the NGO code of conduct, but it could also monitor NGO effectiveness and alignment with country national development strategies. Using country governments to help monitor NGO effectiveness (and adherence to the code) has the drawback that governments are prone to corruption. This however could be overcome through checks done by the coalition. If the recipient country’s government is corrupt and dysfunctional, channeling aid away from the government and to its local NGOs could help in initiating a dialogue, both within the recipient country and internationally among donor communities. Mandating the code for all NGOs working in a recipient country will decrease the tendency to dismiss it as something optional. Perhaps the monitors of the code could learn something from the way the military makes ‘recommendations’ for a code of conduct!

Resources:
GDRC NGO Codes of Conduct

Anti Corruption Resource Centre – Developing a code of conduct for NGOs

Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development – The Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action

Former Gates Foundation Leader to be Nominated for USAID Administrator

by Global Washington Policy Coordinator Danielle Ellingston
Rajiv ShahRajiv Shah, formerly the director of agricultural development at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, will be named to head USAID just in the nick of time.  He has already been confirmed by the Senate for a position in the Department of Agriculture, so it is possible that he will sail through confirmation for USAID administrator and we will have someone in place in early 2010.

Shah’s bio is impressive: he has an MD, a degree in economics, and a lot of international development experience.  He also has ties to the Seattle community, having served on many boards of local organizations including the Seattle Public Library and Agros International.

Much has been said about Shah’s youth- he is only 36 years old, which could be an asset but it may also work against him.  According to a hill staffer quoted by the Politico Blog, “He will be a good antidote to some of the stagnancy currently plaguing the agency and will hopefully have a mandate to fundamentally change the way business is done over there. … Also hear from the Agriculture Committee staff that he’s done a great job thus far and is very well-respected.”

It sounds like Shah may be the agent of change that is needed over at USAID, since talk about foreign aid reform is heating up.  2010 is going to be an important year for foreign aid reform.

Blueprint for Action: Convene, Strengthen, Advocate in a Digital Democracy

blueprint_screenshotGlobal Washington just launched our crowdsourcing site, Blueprint for Action, a collaborative social media project dedicated to building a ‘digital democracy’. We encourage everyone willing to share an innovative idea for tackling global development challenges to participate in setting priorities for the sector. Blueprint for Action is an inclusive forum for you to connect with other progressive thinkers dedicated to eradicating poverty, improving global health, promoting human rights and empowering women around the world. By fostering a community of creative participation and open dialogue, we all strengthen our power and resolve against social and economic injustice.

To strengthen our unified voice, contribute your priority for global development in our Feedback Forum at: www.blueprintforaction.org

To read about crowdsourcing as an emerging communication tool in philanthropy, take a peek at Kristi Heim’s profile in the Seattle Times.

Rural Development Institute Receives $9 Million Grant!

The Rural Development Institute, a prolific organization committed to securing land rights for the rural poor around the world for the past forty years, received a $9 million dollar grant last week—the largest in the institute’s history. The Omidyar Network, a philanthropic investment group started by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar and his wife, Pam, awarded RDI the impressive grant for their groundbreaking work in land reform policy.

According to Tim Hanstad, RDI’s president and CEO, “With this grant, RDI will begin implementing an ambitious three-year plan to bring secure land rights to 9 million families living in poverty,” he said. “These rights can bring about transformative economic and social benefits that improve well-being and restore dignity.”

It has been a landmark year for the land reformists. In addition to receiving the grant, RDI launched its Global Center for Women’s Land Rights, an initiative dedicated to procuring land ownership for women. Though much global development research speaks to women’s pivotal role in advancing economic growth, empowering women as key players in development continues to be met with resistance. The Global Center for Land Rights promotes women’s land ownership as a strategy for legally and socially legitimizing women’s participation in economic development.

Renée Giovarelli, Director of the Global Center for Women’s Land Rights, will participate in a panel on addressing poverty through women at Global Washington’s Annual Conference on December 7th. Global Washington’s Annual Conference will bring together the best and the brightest in the global development sector in an effort to solidify Washington State’s commitment to eradicating poverty, improving health outcomes, and increasing global access to quality education. For a full list of speakers in attendance and to register for the conference, click here.

Kristi Heim’s article for the Seattle Times on November 5th chronicles the Omidyar Network’s active participation in RDI’s mission to democratically secure property ownership for rural families worldwide.

Find out more about the Rural Development Institute’s innovative work by visiting their website.

More On Crowdsourcing: Ideas For Philanthropy And Development

“The interesting marriage between online communities and the social sector has produced two more offspring: One is a project by Global Washington called Blueprint for Action, which asks the public to help set priorities for development by posting their ideas…the author with the most votes gets to host a session on that topic at a conference next month in Seattle.”

More On Crowdsourcing: Ideas For Philanthropy And Development
The Seattle Times |  Posted by Kristi Heim | November 4, 2009

Halloween Has Come and Gone but USAID Remains Headless

by Global Washington Policy Coordinator, Danielle Ellingston

headless_horsemanThis is beginning to sound like a whiny broken record, but WHEN OH WHEN is the Obama administration going to nominate a USAID administrator?

Last January, the development community was full of hope.  It seemed that all the pieces were in place for meaningful foreign aid reform.  We knew we were going to get a USAID administrator who would represent the agency well in planning for reform.  Obama made all the right noises about development being one of the 3 D’s along with defense and diplomacy.  The major players in Congress were on board, and the NGO community was clamoring for change.  For once, development would matter!  Armchair development policy analysts sat around water coolers from coast to coast, guessing who the nominee would be.  We wondered if U.S. development assistance would be elevated above its recent State Department step-sister status, and maybe it would be given (gasp!) cabinet level status.  Not that we would insist on that, no, that would be asking too much, but maybe development could at least get a little more clout in making the big policy decisions?  Maybe we could have a voice of our own, and not rely on a benevolent State Department?  You could feel the excitement in the halls all year long, from the Ronald Reagan building all the way to our little office on Lake Union.

Then there was silence.  Dead silence from the White House.  Bills on aid reform were introduced in Congress, but without a USAID administrator nominee, they seemed ahead of the game.  How can we ask for a major commitment of time and energy toward reform when we can’t even get a USAID administrator?

Now we are starting to get a little nervous.  Why has the White House still not nominated someone to lead USAID?  Why do we feel like we’re being avoided?  Even President Bush managed to appoint Andrew Natsios by May of his first year in office.  Chairman John Kerry and Ranking Member Richard Lugar of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee have written to President Obama expressing their concern.  The answer from the White House is “soon,” but we don’t know what “soon” means, since “soon” has already passed.  We have some clues.  Secretary Clinton vented some frustration last summer about the arduous vetting process for nominees.  Some folks are speculating that none of the top contenders want the job, because of the “ridiculous” vetting process combined with the ambiguous level of authority given to the USAID administrator.  So much for the three D’s.

At this point, many people feel that in order to get an appointment confirmed as soon as possible Obama should nominate someone who has already passed the vetting process for another position.  The downside of this approach is that we are limiting our options at a time when we need more than a warm body at the heart of the foremost U.S. development agency.  Still, it may be our best bet for getting an appointment before we break for the New Year.

Do We Hold Our Adversaries More Accountable?

gates-graph

A provocative debate over Bill Easterly’s critique of The Gates Foundation’s questionable data reporting continues to incite controversy. Easterly’s assertion that the Gates Foundation cherry-picked data to validate the success of their malaria treatment and prevention programs has been met with mixed criticism. David Roodman’s post for the Center of Global Development challenges Easterly’s own vigilance in subjecting those who share his views with the same scrutiny as his adversaries. How does an organization’s need to show programmatic success in order to gather donor support compromise standards and best practices in data collection and analysis? Furthermore, are we biased toward judging those who agree with us less harshly, even in the name of scientific research? Let us know what you think!