Blog

The Release of Global Washington’s Policy Paper

One might not usually expect to find an indoor auditorium packed to capacity on a beautiful sunny, Seattle summer afternoon. But on July 6, Seattle University’s Pigott Auditorium was filled to capacity as Senator Maria Cantwell and Maura O’Neill, Chief Innovation Operator of USAID headlined the release of Global Washington’s policy paper; “Global Development through Trade, Aid, Education, and Partnerships: Recommendations from Global Washington.” This paper was designed to provide policy makers with the knowledge and tools with which to reform a broken foreign assistance system.

After an introduction by Stephen Sanborg S.J., president of Seattle University, Senator Cantwell highlighted the importance of Global Washington’s activity in a state that is deeply connected with the world around it. With a culture of unbridled generosity, caring, and innovation, Senator Cantwell believes Washington State is well positioned to provide recommendations to the policy makers in Washington DC on issues of development. As Senator Cantwell recognized, it is very uncommon for constituents to provide their elected officials with clear policy recommendations and a plan to enact those policies. Thus Senator Cantwell committed herself to play her part in promoting these recommendations. To raise awareness of the need to reform the foreign aid system, Senator Cantwell promised that she and Senator Patty Murray would work together to ensure policy makers such as President Obama, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton and important Congressional leaders consider these recommendations.

Senator Cantwell noted that with only 1% of the federal budget, foreign aid funding must be spent as efficiently as possible to ensure development objectives are met. Development projects must be crafted to ensure aid reaches the intended targets, that aid is measurable and that future development strategy is formed on results. Given President Obama’s understanding and commitment to strengthening development alongside diplomacy and defense, Senator Cantwell believes there is no better time than now to reform foreign aid. Referencing a local Native American saying, “Alki,” Senator Cantwell ended by saying “Global WA is giving hope for everyone in the future.”

After Senator Cantwell’s speech, a panel of leaders in the development community convened to discuss the main recommendations of the policy paper. Jennifer Potter, President and CEO of the Initiative for Global Development, opened the panel discussion by noting the need to make foreign aid a main priority of the U.S. government. To accomplish this task, Ms. Potter offered several primary recommendations of the policy paper. Most notably, Ms. Potter expounded the need to create a national development strategy that would incorporate various policy sectors such as trade, aid, and agriculture. Ms. Potter also voiced the importance of targeting aid to those most in need and ensuring the local ownership of aid projects, a central tenet of the Millennium Challenge Corporation.

Steve Crane, president of Crane International, focused on trade as it relates to development policy. While noting there is still much to be done to achieve the goals of development, Mr. Crane believes trade is an important factor in achieving development. As such, Mr. Crane highlighted the need to target aid to build the capacity of local entrepreneurs as a means to achieve sustainable economic growth. Mr. Crane also noted the need to grant the poorest countries duty-free access to U.S. markets.

Given that education correlates to positive trends in society such as improved health, higher levels of economic growth, and increased democracy, Steve Hanson believes global education policy must be incorporated and coordinated with development policy. Scott Jackson, of the Rural Development Institute discussed the need to improve public-private partnerships in the development community. To ensure partnerships work as effectively as possible towards achieving development goals, Mr. Jackson offered the recommendation that a directory of all opportunities to work with the government be created. Such a tool would clearly delineate the roles of all organizations and facilitate a stronger public-private partnership.

The panel discussion ended with a speech by Maura O’Neill, the Chief Innovation Officer at USAID, calling on Washington State to harness its bountiful sources of innovation to work towards achieving development objectives. For local ownership of aid projects to work with sustainability, Ms. O’Neill believes a dialogue must be in place between donors and local leaders in which a free exchange of ideas exists. Simply fulfilling the requests of the locals can often be counterproductive to the goals of the development project. Ms. O’Neill also informed the audience of the current administration’s policy shift from a focus on basic education, to a focus on higher education. Another important concept of development Ms. O’Neill discussed was scale. The development community must learn how to build development models that can be scaled-up and apply to a larger population.

With such a large turnout from Washington State’s development sector, it is apparent that the issue of foreign aid reform is of paramount concern to the global development community. Hopefully, as this policy paper makes its way to the political arena of Washington, DC, policy makers will awaken to the pressing need of reforming the bloated and fractured U.S. foreign assistance structure.

To read the full version of our policy paper and other publications of Global Washington, please visit our website.

The President’s New Approach to Development

Nearly two months after the draft Presidential Study Directive (PSD) on development was leaked, the White House is showing a strong commitment to reforming the U.S. foreign assistance system. At the G8 summit in Muskoka, Cananda, President Obama issued a statement outlining his objectives in reforming the U.S. global development strategy entitled “a New Approach to Advancing Development.” Like the draft PSD, President Obama’s new approach would place a greater emphasis on research and innovation, tailor development strategies to specific conditions in the field, and hold all aid recipients accountable for results.

Unlike the leaked PSD draft, this new development approach explicitly exemplifies all four of Global Washington’s Principles of Aid Effectiveness; consolidation and coordination, transparency and accountability, targeting to those most in need, and local ownership. By strengthening multilateral capabilities, the U.S. can consolidate resources and increase donor coordination. Using data and analysis from strong monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to guide policy will help to make the process more transparent and will increase both donors’ and recipients’ accountability to results. President Obama’s new development strategy will also target aid to select countries, regions, and sectors and emphasize local ownership of development projects.

Missing from this strategy, however, is any mention of institutional reform of the U.S. foreign assistance structure. Without addressing the tangled and unwieldy web of U.S. departments and agencies charged with carrying out U.S. development programs, the goals of President Obama’s new development strategy may not be met. Such reforms will most likely be taken up by the highly anticipated development policy directive to be released in the near future. Until the official policy directive is released, “a New Approach to Advancing Development” acts as a strong framework of objectives to be met by a new U.S. foreign assistance strategy.

President Obama’s New Global Health Initiative

by Eugenia Ho, Global Washington Volunteer

It has been an exciting month for the global health community.  On June 2, the Gates Foundation announced a new investment of $1.5 billion over the next five years in maternal and child health, family planning and nutrition in developing countries.   Also, the G8 nations are gearing up for their summit later this week,  where they will discuss a new initiative on maternal, newborn and child health in an effort to work toward achieving the health-related Millennium Development Goals.  In the lead-up to the G8 Summit, Canada has announced its willingness to inject about $1 billion in maternal and child health in poor countries if other countries ante up.

Of course, we cannot overlook the latest development on the Global Health Initiative (GHI) – a U.S. program with the largest amount of money that has ever been committed to any global health initiative.   On June 18, 2010, the U.S. Department of State, USAID and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced the GHI program’s governance structure and the first eight countries selected to receive additional technical and management resources under this initiative.   The eight countries are: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Nepal, and Rwanda. 

The Global Health Initiative is a $63 billion investment over six years to help over 80 partner countries, where U.S. government global health dollars are already at work. The initiative aims to improve measurable health outcomes by strengthening health systems and building upon proven results.  With a comprehensive approach, it places a particular focus on improving the health of women, newborns and children.

According to the GHI’s Fact Sheet on the USAID website, the GHI established goals for improving health outcomes in HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, child health, nutrition, family planning and reproductive health, and neglected tropical diseases, with these principles:

– implementing a woman- and girl-centered approach

– increasing impact through strategic coordination and integration

– strengthen and leveraging key multilateral organizations, global health partnerships and private sector engagement

– encouraging country ownership and investing in country-led plans

– building sustainability through health systems strengthening

– improving metrics, monitoring and evaluation; and

– promoting research and innovation

The GHI announcement was welcomed by organizations such as UNAIDS and Oxfam America; while some organizations have different views.  Dr. Peter Mugyenyi, who runs the Joint Clinical Research Center in Kampala, Uganda, which is almost entirely PEPFAR funded, spoke about his concerns on NPR’s Morning Edition radio show.  He worries that the funding for HIV/AIDS will be diluted as more diseases become the focus under GHI.

 As you know, Washington State is a world leader in the field of global health, so this initiative could have a direct impact on local organizations.  According to the Washington State Department of Commerce, about $143 million of Washington’s annual tax revenue is generated by global health activities.  Washington State is home to some of the most renowned organizations and institutions with expertise in global health.  They include PATH, Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, the Gates Foundation, the University of Washington, Washington State University, and Washington Global Health Alliance (WGHA).  A Washington-based organization, Health Alliance International, is part of a coalition of global health advocacy organizations who use the same name – the Global Health Initiative, and they came up with recommendations on how US development assistance for health should be structured in the future. 

Below are some additional news and resources on the Global Health Initiative:

 The Global Health Initiative Fact Sheet on USAID

Huffington Post

Wall Street Journal